DNP 820 Week 4 Introduction to the Literature Review Assignment
DNP 820 Week 4 Introduction to the Literature Review Assignment
Details:
Empirical research is the foundation of scholarly research and scholarly writing. An empirical article is defined as one that reports actual results of a research study. An empirical article includes a description of the study, an introduction, a research question, an explanation of the study’s methodology, a presentation of the results of the study, and a conclusion that discusses the results and suggests topics for further study.
As you search the library for scholarly research, you should limit your search to identify empirical articles. (You can use the “Empirical Research Checklist” from DNP-801 to assist in this determination.) After finding an empirical study, begin to assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers the proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.
As you move forward in your doctoral journey, you will read research papers that will require you to assess the validity of the studies in question. To accomplish this, qualitative assessments about the research must be made by comparing, contrasting, and synthesizing what the research says.
In this assignment, you will continue to develop the skill of writing, by reviewing 15 research articles associated with your chosen topic and using the content to identify at least five major concepts and subthemes related to your topic.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of this assignment:
- Use the “Empirical Research Checklist” to assist in the determination of empirical articles.
- Use the “Research Article Chart” to provide a summary review of each component of your assignment.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Part 1: Selection of 15 Articles
Select 15 empirical articles related to your PICOT question. Use the “Empirical Research Checklist” worksheet to ensure that each article you select meets all of the established criteria. At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology.
Part 2: Research Article Chart
Using the articles acquired in Part 1, provide a summary review of each component using the “Research Article Chart” template.
Part 3: Synthesis of Research Studies
Based upon your review of the 15 research articles, identify at least five major concepts that relate to your project topic, and three subthemes related to each concept.
Using the information from the completed “Research Article Chart,” and the major concepts and subthemes you have identified, write a 2,000-3,000 word paper that synthesizes the content of the 15 research studies.
Summarize each major concept and focus on providing a detailed synthesis of the three identified subthemes that support that concept by addressing the following.
- Introduction of the identified subtheme
- Summary of the research questions posed by the studies
- Summary of the sample populations used
- Summary of the limitations of the studies
- Summary of the conclusion and recommendations for further research
Portfolio Practice Hours:
Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the learner, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10.
You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.
To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:
DNP 820 Topic 4 DQ 1
Reliability and validity are often misunderstood and not given much notice in research articles. Using any example, demonstrate how you would correctly describe these two terms to a nurse prepared at a bachelor’s degree level or below. Then describe why the reliability and validity of a study is important for translation.
DNP 820 Topic 4 DQ 2
What are the criteria for selecting qualitative versus quantitative resources in relation to your literature review? Which method(s) of research are you selecting? Why?
Apply Rubrics
Empirical Research Identification
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
87.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
5.0 %Abstracts Abstracts for three empirical articles are not included. Abstracts for three empirical articles are incomplete or incorrect. Abstracts for three empirical articles are partially complete and correct. Abstracts for three empirical articles are mostly complete and correct. Abstracts for three empirical articles are included are complete, correct, and provide substantial evidence.
15.0 %Introduction Introduction for three empirical articles is not included. Introduction for three empirical articles is incomplete or incorrect. Introduction for three empirical articles is included but lacks a detailed summary or fails to address specified key points. Introduction for three empirical articles is summarized in paragraph form and addresses specified key points. Introduction for three empirical articles is extensive and includes substantial details related to specified key points.
15.0 %Methods Methods for three empirical articles are not included. Methods for three empirical articles are incomplete or incorrect. Methods for three empirical articles are included but lack a detailed summary or fail to address specified key points. Methods for three empirical articles are summarized in paragraph form and address specified key points. Methods for three empirical articles are extensive and include substantial details related to specified key points.
12.0 %Results Results for three empirical articles are not included. Results for three empirical articles are incomplete or incorrect. Results for three empirical articles are included but lack a detailed summary or fail to address specified key points. Results for three empirical articles are summarized in paragraph form and address specified key points Results for three empirical articles are extensive and include substantial details related to specified key points.
15.0 %Conclusion Conclusion for three empirical articles is not included. Conclusion for three empirical articles is incomplete or incorrect. Conclusion for three empirical articles is included but lacks a detailed summary or fails to address specified key points. Conclusion for three empirical articles is summarized in paragraph form and addresses specified key points. Conclusion for three empirical articles is extensive and includes substantial details related to specified key points.
8.0 %References References for three empirical articles are not included. References for three empirical articles are incomplete or incorrect. References for three empirical articles are included but lack a detailed summary or fail to address specified key points. References for three empirical articles are summarized in paragraph form and address specified key points. References for three empirical articles are extensive and include substantial details related to specified key points.
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage DNP 820 Week 4 Introduction to the Literature Review Assignment
