Order
Toll-free 24/7:
+1(256)7436183
Order

Tina Jones Neurological Objective Data

Author:
May 28th, 2023

Tina Jones Neurological Objective Data Shadow Health Assessment

Tina Jones Neurological Objective Data

Permalink: 

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Tina Jones Neurological Objective Data
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Objective Data Collection: 36.75 of 37 (99.32%)

  •  Correct
  •  Partially correct
  •  Incorrect
  •  Missed
 Confirmed orientation
1 of 1 point
To Person (1/3 point)
  •  Oriented to person
  •  Not oriented to person
To Place (1/3 point)
  •  Oriented to place
  •  Not oriented to place
To Time (1/3 point)
  •  Oriented to time
  •  Not oriented to time
 Evaluated abstract thinking
1 of 1 point
Abstractness (1/2 point)
  •  Abstract
  •  Concrete
Relevance (1/2 point)
  •  Relevant
  •  Not relevant
 Evaluated attention span
1 of 1 point
Serial 7s Test (1/1 point)
  •  Accurate
  •  Not accurate
 Evaluated comprehension
1 of 1 point
Observations (1/1 point)
.
.

  •  Able to follow instructions
  •  Unable to follow instructions
 Evaluated general knowledge
1 of 1 point
Accuracy (1/1 point)
  •  Accurate
  •  Not accurate
 Evaluated judgment
1 of 1 point
Observations (1/1 point)
  •  Intact
  •  Not intact
 Evaluated memory
1 of 1 point
Remote Memory (1/3 point)
  •  Intact
  •  Not intact
Immediate Memory (1/3 point)
  •  Intact
  •  Not intact
New Learning Ability (1/3 point)
  •  Accurate
  •  Not accurate
 Observed vocabulary
1 of 1 point
Complexity (1/1 point)
  •  Expected complex for patient’s age, education level, and general ability
  •  Not expected complexity
  • Tina Jones Neurological shadow health assessment Objective Data
 Observed articulation
1 of 1 point
Observations (1/1 point)
  •  No observed problems with pronunciation or expression
  •  Imprecise pronunciation of consonants
  •  Slurring
  •  Hesitation
  •  Stutter
 Tested olfactory nerve
1 of 1 point
Sense Of Smell (1/2 point)
  •  Able to discriminate
  •  Not able to discriminate
Symmetric (1/2 point)
  •  Symmetric bilaterally
  •  Asymmetric
 Tested visual acuity (optic nerve)
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  20/100
  •  20/70
  •  20/50
  •  20/40
  •  20/30
  •  20/25
  •  20/20
  •  20/15
  •  20/13
  •  20/10
Left (1/2 point)
  •  20/100
  •  20/70
  •  20/50
  •  20/40
  •  20/30
  •  20/25
  •  20/20
  •  20/15
  •  20/13
  •  20/10
 Examined retina with ophthalmoscope (optic nerve)
0.75 of 1 point
Right: Fundus (No point)
  •  No visible abnormal findings
  •  Myelinated nerve fibers
  •  Papilledema
  •  Glaucomatous cupping
  •  Drusen bodies
  •  Cotton wool bodies
  •  Hemorrhage
Right: Disc Margin (1/4 point)
  •  Sharp
  •  Blurred
Left: Fundus (1/4 point)
  •  No visible abnormal findings
  •  Myelinated nerve fibers
  •  Papilledema
  •  Glaucomatous cupping
  •  Drusen bodies
  •  Cotton wool bodies
  •  Hemorrhage
Left: Disc Margin (1/4 point)
  •  Sharp
  •  Blurred
 Inspected pupils (optic and oculomotor nerves)
1 of 1 point
Observations With Penlight (1/1 point)
  •  No visible abnormal findings (PERRL)
  •  Unequal
  •  Irregular
  •  Miosis
  •  Mydriasis
  •  Non-reactive to light
 Tested extraocular eye movements (extraocular movements: oculomotor, trochlear, abducens nerves)
1 of 1 point
Cardinal Fields (1/2 point)
  •  No visible abnormal findings
  •  Nystagmus
  •  Fixed pupil
Convergence (1/2 point)
  •  No visible abnormal findings
  •  Unequal bilaterally
  •  Fixed pupil
 Tested facial sensation (trigeminal nerve)
1 of 1 point
Observations (1/1 point)
  •  Intact
  •  Unable to feel dull stimulus
  •  Unable to feel sharp stimulus
  •  Unable to feel soft stimulus
 Inspected head and face (facial nerve)
1 of 1 point
Skull Symmetry (1/2 point)
  •  Symmetric
  •  Asymmetric
Facial Feature Symmetry (1/2 point)
  •  Symmetric
  •  Asymmetric
 Performed Weber test (auditory nerve)
1 of 1 point
Results (1/1 point)
  •  Normal
  •  Conductive or sensorineural loss
 Performed Rinne test (auditory nerve)
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  Normal
  •  Conductive loss
Left (1/2 point)
  •  Normal
  •  Conductive loss
 Tested gag reflex (glossopharyngeal, vagus nerves)
1 of 1 point
Observations (1/1 point)
  •  Intact
  •  Absent
  •  Hypersensitive
 Tested shoulder shrugging (accessory nerve)
1 of 1 point
Observations (1/2 point)
  •  Symmetric
  •  Asymmetric
Strength (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No evidence of movement
  •  1 – Trace of movement
  •  2 – Full range of motion with passive movement only
  •  3 – Full range of motion against gravity, with no resistance
  •  4 – Full but weak range of motion against gravity, with some resistance
  •  5 – Full range of motion against gravity, with resistance
  • Tina Jones Neurological shadow health assessment Objective Data
 Tested neck strength (accessory nerve)
1 of 1 point
Strength (1/1 point)
  •  0 – No evidence of movement
  •  1 – Trace of movement
  •  2 – Full range of motion with passive movement only
  •  3 – Full range of motion against gravity, with no resistance
  •  4 – Full but weak range of motion against gravity, with some resistance
  •  5 – Full range of motion against gravity, with resistance
 Inspected tongue (hypoglossal nerve)
1 of 1 point
Symmetry (1/2 point)
  •  Symmetric
  •  Asymmetric
Observations (1/2 point)
  •  No visible abnormal findings
  •  Fasciculations
  •  Deviation from midline
  •  Atrophy
 Tested deep tendon reflexes in triceps
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
Left (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
 Tested deep tendon reflexes in biceps
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
Left (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
 Tested deep tendon reflexes in brachioradialis
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
Left (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
 Tested deep tendon reflexes in patellar tendon
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
Left (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
 Tested deep tendon reflexes in Achilles tendon
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
Left (1/2 point)
  •  0 – No response
  •  1 – Diminished
  •  2 – Expected (active)
  •  3 – Hyperactive
  •  4 – Hyperactive, with clonus
 Tested point-to-point movements: Finger to nose
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  Smooth and accurate
  •  Jerky
  •  Inaccurate
Left (1/2 point)
  •  Smooth and accurate
  •  Jerky
  •  Inaccurate
 Tested point-to-point movements: Heel to shin
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  Smooth and accurate
  •  Jerky
  •  Inaccurate
Left (1/2 point)
  •  Smooth and accurate
  •  Jerky
  •  Inaccurate
 Tested coordination with rapid alternating hand movements
1 of 1 point
Observations (1/1 point)
  •  Able to perform without difficulty
  •  Performs but with difficulty
  •  Unable to perform
 Observed gait
1 of 1 point
Balance (1/2 point)
  •  Steady
  •  Unsteady
Gait (1/2 point)
  •  Continuous, symmetric steps
  •  Discontinuous steps
  •  Asymmetric steps
  •  Stagger
  •  Swaying
  •  Hesitancy due to injury
  •  Use of arms
 Tested graphesthesia
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  Able to identify
  •  Unable to identify
Left (1/2 point)
  •  Able to identify
  •  Unable to identify
 Tested sensation in arms
1 of 1 point
Right: Dull Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Left: Dull Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
  • Tina Jones Neurological shadow health assessment Objective Data
Right: Soft Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Left: Soft Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Right: Sharp Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Left: Sharp Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
 Tested sensation in legs
1 of 1 point
Right: Dull Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
  • Tina Jones Neurological shadow health assessment Objective Data
Left: Dull Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Right: Soft Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Left: Soft Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Right: Sharp Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
Left: Sharp Touch (1/6 point)
  •  Expected sensation in proximal and distal
  •  Decreased proximal sensation
  •  Decreased distal sensation
 Tested sensation in feet
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  Expected sensation
  •  Decreased sensation
Left (1/2 point)
  •  Expected sensation
  •  Decreased sensation
 Tested position sense
1 of 1 point
Fingers (1/2 point)
  •  Intact
  •  Not intact
Toes (1/2 point)
  •  Intact
  •  Not intact
 Tested stereognosis
1 of 1 point
Right (1/2 point)
  •  Able to identify
  •  Unable to identify
Left (1/2 point)
  •  Able to identify
  •  Unable to identify
  • Tina Jones Neurological shadow health assessment Objective Data

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Medicine
This was done very well. Thank you!
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time
Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE ADVOCATE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM
The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!
Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022
Medicine
Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Well researched paper. Excellent work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat