Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disorders

Discipline: Nursing

Type of Paper: Coursework

Academic Level: High school

Paper Format: APA

Pages: 3 Words: 825

Question

Case Study:

 

LM is an 89-year-old female resident of a long-term care facility who has been experiencing multiple falls, some resulting in injuries such as bruising and skin tears. Over the last 6 months, her ambulation status has declined from independent to wheelchair level. She complains of pain in her legs when walking more than short distances across the nursing unit.

PMH:

  • HTN
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Diabetes

MEDICATIONS:

  • Amlodipine 10 mg QD
  • Donepezil 10 mg QHS
  • Levothyroxine 0.88 mg QAM
  • Celecoxib 200 mg QD
  • Furosemide 40 mg QAM
  • Metformin 500mg, 1 BID
  • Glyburide 5mg, 1 BID

ALLERGIES: NKA

SOCIAL HISTORY:

Widowed with 2 adult children living in town, retired photographer and owner of an art supply store

VITALS:                                             LABS:

Weight: 129 lbs                                   TSH 2.45         Free T4 0.98

Height: 64 inches                                Na 135, K+ 3.8, Cl 99, CO2 25,

BP: Supine = 177/82                           Glucose 101, SCr 0.9, BUN 42

HR: 78 bpm                                         WBC 7.0, RBC 4.5, Hgb 11.9, Hct 34.1

Plt 255

Cr: 1.6 UA: Clear

eGFR: 45 ml/min

PE:

  • HEENT: Normocephalic, no evidence of trauma, PERRLA, EOMI, Dry mucous membranes
  • CV: RRR
  • Respiratory: Clear to auscultation bilaterally
  • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no masses or guarding
  • G/U: Skin intact, assisted with toileting and personal hygiene by staff
  • Extremities: Bilateral 2+ edema to lower extremities; skin dry, dark bruising and skin tear to right elbow and forearm
  • Neuro: Alert and oriented to person only. MMSE 18/30, stable over last 12 months.

PAIN ASSESSMENT:

Faces pain scale: No pain occurs at rest, upon walking, pain is moderate to severe

This announcement is closed for comments

 

 

To Prepare

  • Review the Resources for this module and consider the impact of potential pharmacotherapeutics for cardiovascular disorders introduced in the media piece.
  • Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment.
  • Select one the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior factors.
  • Reflect on how the factor you selected might influence the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
  • Consider how changes in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
  • Think about how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Reflect on whether you would modify the current drug treatment or provide an alternative treatment option for the patient.

Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.
  • Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Explain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.

·         NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely explains in detail how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response provides a basic explanation of how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient, or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. ... Accurate, complete, and aligned examples are provided to support the response.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. ... Accurate examples may be provided to support the response.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. ... Inaccurate or vague examples are provided to support the response.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy, or is missing. ... Inaccurate and vague examples may be provided to support the response, or is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explain how you might improve the patient's drug therapy plan, and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. ... The response includes an accurate and detailed explanation to support the recommended improvements.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. ... The response may include an accurate explanation to support the recommended improvements.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. ... The response may include an inaccurate, vague, or misaligned explanation to support the recommended improvements.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan, or is missing. ... The response may include an inaccurate and vague explanation to support the recommended improvements, or is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100