N581-19A_20Sep Advanced Practice Nursing I Preceptorship Experience
Discipline: Nursing
Type of Paper: Research paper
Academic Level: Undergrad. (yrs 3-4)
Paper Format: APA
Question
Assignment 3
A 58 year old male patient who is unemployed and overweight presents
to the office with complaints of chest pressure
and jaw pain that resolved
after resting yesterday.
He is in a monogamous
relationship with a life partner.
He admits a history of hypercholesteremia but does not take medications
CC: “I had chest pain when doing laundry yesterday.” Past medical history:
Anxiety, hypercholesteremia
Family History- Father died at 60 from a myocardial
infarction
Vital signs: Blood pressure: 158/98; height, 5 feet 6 inches; weight, 242 lbs. Lab results:
TC 420
LDL 190
HDL 32
Glucose: 228
Hgb 14
Hct 38
MCV 78
Questions:
1. What additional subjective data do you think the patient will share?
2. What additional objective
data will you be assessing
for?
3.
What National Guidelines are appropriate to consider? What level of evidence supports
these guidelines?
4. What tests will you order?
5. Will you be looking for a consult?
6. What are the medical and nursing diagnoses?
7. Are there any legal/ethical considerations?
8. What is your plan of care? medical
nursing
complementary therapies
9. Are there any Healthy People 2020 objectives that you should consider?
10. Using the Circle of Caring, what or who else should be involved to truly hear the patient’s
voice, getting him and the family involved in the care to reach optimal health?
11. What additional patient teaching is needed?
12. What billing codes would you recommend?
Grading Rubric
Criteria |
10 Points |
7 Points |
4 Points |
0 0 Points |
|
Assessment |
Develops and demonstrates a clear & precise
assessment plan supported with professional literature and includes objective and subjective data. |
Develops and demonstrates an assessment plan but not fully supported with professional literature may be missing
one important piece of data |
Develops and demonstrates a brief & vague assessment plan while missing
important details of the assessment data; supported with minimal
professional literature. |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Guidelines/Evidence |
Thoroughly describes all relevant practice guidelines. Clearly defines and delineates the levels of evidence that support the guidelines. |
Describes relevant practice guidelines and/or describes levels
of evidence to support guidelines but does not
do both. |
Describes a brief & vague treatment plan but lists no guidelines and does not level evidence. |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Diagnostics |
Clearly describes all appropriate diagnostics (including sensitivity and specificity). Clearly differentiates the difference between a positive and a negative finding and APN considerations |
Describes all appropriate diagnostics but does not discuss
the difference between
a positive and negative
finding or lacks a discussion of specificity and sensitivity for each diagnostic |
Simply lists some diagnostics but does not discuss
specificity, sensitivity, negative, or positive and APN considerations |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Treatment Plan |
Develops and provides a clearly written
set of orders
inclusive of all essential elements
in a treatment plan. |
Develops a clear set of written
orders but omits
an important order
for the diagnosis |
Develops and provides
a brief set of orders
for the treatment plan with more
than one omission. |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Healthy People 2020
Health Promotion |
Develops and demonstrates a clear
& precise description of the Healthy People 2020 goals
and specifically relates
one goal to current case. |
Develops a Health Promotion plan and/or discusses Healthy People 2020 and the relation to the case |
Describes Health
Promotion but does not relate back to the case |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Evaluation |
Develops and demonstrates a clear
& precise evaluation plan for the next office
visit inclusive of data that will indicate
no change necessary in plan or changes necessary in the plan |
Develops a evaluation plan for next office visit.
Includes data but does not describe predictive changes |
Develops a vague evaluation plan. There
is no data identified or plan |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Patient/Family Teaching |
Develops and demonstrates a clear
& precise educational plan for the patient and family. |
Educational topics
are described but no plan is developed for the patient
and family |
A general educational plan is shared
but is not specific to the current
case.. |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Billing |
Discusses all levels of billing that apply
to the case
and most likely
appropriate level for first visit and one follow up visit |
Discusses only the billing level that the APN may utilize
without rationalization and the differences in initial and
follow up |
Discusses billing
levels however provides inaccurate levels or rationalization |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
Follow up |
Develops a follow up plan that specifically identifies the data that will need to be reviewed during the follow
up visit. (This may function as communication to the team…i.e. check
BP, cholesterol, and EKG next visit) |
Discusses a general plan
for follow up but no specific data is listed. May not indicate when follow up should occur
or why? |
Describes a generalized follow up plan that applies to all patients not the specific case. |
No paper submitted or content missing |
/10 |
|
5 Points |
2.5 Points |
0 Points |
|
|
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation |
There are no errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation |
There are a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that do not detract from the meaning |
There are major
errors in grammar,
spelling, and punctuation that do not
reflect scholarly writing |
NA |
/5 |
APA |
The paper
meets APA format guidelines |
There are minor APA format errors |
There are significant errors in format |
NA |
/5 |
Total Points Possible
= 100 |
|