NURS 6521 Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

NURS 6521 Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

NURS 6521 Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6521 Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

This paper is an examination of a case study of a patient with neurological and musculoskeletal disorder. The essay summarizes the patient’s case study, treatment decisions, and assesses if evidence-based literature supports the decisions. It also explores the anticipated outcomes with the selected decisions and if there were differences in the outcomes.


Summary of the Case Study

 The case study is of a 43-year-old white male that presents to the office with complain of pain. He ambulates with the assistance of crutches. The patient came as a referral by his family doctor for psychiatric assessment since he believes that the client’s problem is in his head. The client reports a history of fall and numerous diagnostic tests. The client developed cramping of his right leg accompanied by color changing to purple from knee down. Mental status examination led to the client being diagnosed with complex regional pain disorder (reflex sympathetic dystrophy).

Treatment Decisions

 The first decision made for the client is initiating him on Amitriptyline 25 mg po QHS and titrating upward weekly by 25 mg to a maximum dose of 200 mg per day. The second treatment decision for the client is continuing current medication and increase dose to 125 mg at bedtime this week continuing towards the goal of 200 mg daily. Instruct the client to take the medication an hour earlier than normal starting tonight and call the office in 3 days to report how his function is in the morning. The third decision is to continue with the current dose of Elavil 125 mg per day, refer the client to a life coach who can counsel him on good dietary habits and exercise.

If the Decisions were Supported by Evidence-Based Literature

Evidence-based literature supports the above decisions. According to Komoly, (2019), amitriptyline is high effective in reducing pain, motor and autonomic symptoms that patients with regional pain syndrome experience. An investigation by Javed and Abdi (2021) revealed that amitriptyline demonstrated similar efficacy to gabapentin in managing complex regional pain syndrome. In another study, Vescio et al., (2020) found that the use of amitriptyline for complex regional pain syndrome was associated with improvements in functionality, pain symptoms, and sleep disturbances. Therefore, evidence-based literature supports the decision to treat the patient in the case study with amitriptyline.

What I was Hoping to Achieve with the Decisions

 One of the things that I was hoping to achieve in the first decision was to reduce the pain the patient experiences and improve his functioning. Amitriptyline has been shown to improve neuropathic pain, autonomic and motor symptoms, sleep disturbances, and functionality in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (Javed& Abdi, 2021; Komoly, 2019). Amitriptyline is an antidepressant associated with side effects such as suicidal thoughts, attempts or ideations, QT prolongation, torsade de pointes, and sudden cardiac arrest leading to death. As a result, patients should be initiated on the lowest possible dosage and titrated upwards based on the patient’s response (Vescio et al., 2020).

I was hoping that the second decision would result in further improvement in pain and client’s functional abilities. An increase in the dosage of Amitriptylinewas expected to result in sustained improvement in symptoms, hence, functioning and quality of life. I also expected the client no to develop side and adverse effects associated with the drug. I anticipated sustained improvement in pain and functioning in the third decision(Shermon et al., 2023). The optimum therapeutic dose of amitriptyline would have been achieved, leading to minimum occurrence of symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome.


The outcome in decision one did not align with my expectations. The client returned the clinic with reports of mild reduction in pain and improvements in functioning. The desired serum therapeutic dose of amitriptyline had not been reached at this step. I did not expect the client to report weight gain with the increase in dosage in the second decision. However, weight gain is a common side effect with the use of antidepressants, hence, the need for referring the client to a counselor for education and guidance of healthy lifestyles and behaviors(Handa, 2021; Harnik et al., 2023).


The use of amitriptyline was effective in treating the patient in the case study. Evidence-based literature supports the use of amitriptyline for complex regional pain. I was hoping that the decisions made would result in pain reduction, improved functioning, and quality of life of the patient. There were minimal differences noted between the outcomes and my anticipations.


Handa, R. (2021). Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.In R. Handa (Ed.), Clinical Rheumatology (pp. 201–203).Springer.

Harnik, M. A., Kesselring, P., Ott, A., Urman, R. D., &Luedi, M. M. (2023).Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and the Value of Early Detection.Current Pain and Headache Reports.

Javed, S., & Abdi, S. (2021). Use of anticonvulsants and antidepressants for treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A literature review. Pain Management, 11(2), 189–199.

Komoly, S. (2019).[Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome with amitriptyline].Ideggyogyaszatiszemle, 72(7–8), 279–281.

Shermon, S., Fazio, K. M., Shim, R., Abd-Elsayed, A., & Kim, C. H. (2023). Prescription Trends in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Case–Control Study. Brain Sciences, 13(7), Article 7.

Vescio, A., Testa, G., Culmone, A., Sapienza, M., Valenti, F., Di Maria, F., &Pavone, V. (2020). Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: A Structured Literature Scoping Review. Children, 7(11), Article 11.


Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

For your Assignment, your Instructor will assign you one of the decision tree interactive media pieces provided in the Resources. As you examine the patient case studies in this module’s Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting symptoms of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders.


Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.


Learning Resources

Required Readings

Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Chapter 11, “Basic Principles of Neuropharmacology” (pp. 67–71)

Chapter 12, “Physiology of the Peripheral Nervous System” (pp. 72–81)

Chapter 12, “Muscarinic Agonists and Cholinesterase Inhibitors” (pp. 82–89)

Chapter 14, “Muscarinic Antagonists” (pp. 90-98)

Chapter 15, “Adrenergic Agonists” (pp. 99–107)

Chapter 16, “Adrenergic Antagonists” (pp. 108–119)

Chapter 17, “Indirect-Acting Antiadrenergic Agents” (pp. 120–124)

Chapter 18, “Introduction to Central Nervous System Pharmacology” (pp. 125–126)

Chapter 19, “Drugs for Parkinson Disease” (pp. 127–142)

Chapter 20, “Drugs for Alzheimer Disease” (pp. 159–166)

Chapter 21, “Drugs for Seizure Disorders” (pp. 150–170)

Chapter 22, “Drugs for Muscle Spasm and Spasticity” (pp. 171–178)

Chapter 24, “Opioid Analgesics, Opioid Antagonists, and Nonopioid Centrally Acting Analgesics” (pp. 183–194)

Chapter 59, “Drug Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis” (pp. 513–527)

Chapter 60, “Drug Therapy of Gout” (pp. 528–536)

Chapter 61, “Drugs Affecting Calcium Levels and Bone Mineralization” (pp. 537–556)

American Academy of Family Physicians. (2019). Dementia

Links to an external site.. Retrieved from

This website provides information relating to the diagnosis, treatment, and patient education of dementia. It also presents information on complications and special cases of dementia.

Linn, B. S., Mahvan, T., Smith, B. E. Y., Oung, A. B., Aschenbrenner, H., & Berg, J. M. (2020). Tips and tools for safe opioid prescribing: This review–with tables summarizing opioid options, dosing considerations, and recommendations for tapering–will help you provide rigorous Tx for noncancer pain while ensuring patient safety

Links to an external site.. Journal of Family Practice, 69(6), 280–292.

Document: Mid-Term Summary & Study Guide (PDF)

Download Mid-Term Summary & Study Guide (PDF)

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2019b). Alzheimer’s disease

Links to an external site. [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

In this interactive media piece, you will engage in a set of decisions for prescribing and recommending pharmacotherapeutics to treat Alzheimer’s disease.

Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2019e). Complex regional pain disorder

Links to an external site. [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

In this interactive media piece, you will engage in a set of decisions for prescribing and recommending pharmacotherapeutics to treat complex regional pain disorders.

Disorders of The Nervous System

Reflect on the comprehensive review of disorders of the nervous system and think about how you might recommend or prescribe pharmacotherapeutics to treat these disorders. (15m)

Speed Pharmacology. (2019). Drugs for Parkinson’s Disease (Made Easy)

Links to an external site. [Video].

Note: This media program is approximately 9 minutes.

Speed Pharmacology. (2019). Pharmacology- Drugs for Alzheimer’s Disease (Made Easy)

Links to an external site. [Video].

Note: This media program is approximately 7 minutes.

To Prepare:

Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor.

Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.

Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.

You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.

By Day 7 of Week 8

Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:

Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.

Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.

You will submit this Assignment in Week 8.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!
Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022
This was done very well. Thank you!
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Well researched paper. Excellent work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time
Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023
Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Customer reviews in total
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
Customers referred by a friend
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat