Nurs 646E – Nursing Education Seminar 1

Learning Environment Observation During your professional career as a nurse educator, you will be asked to teach in various learning environments; including traditional classroom, online, and clinical.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on

Just from $13/Page

Order Essay

The purpose of this assignment is to provide knowledge of establishing an environment that promotes student participation, engagement, and optimal student outcomes.

The classroom can be a traditional or clinical setting and be directed at students, nurses, or patients. Using the “ELEOT Reference Guide” complete the “Effective Learning Environments Observation Tool (ELEOT).”

Write a 500-750 word summary of the observation.

Include the following in your summary.

Discuss the results of the ELEOT.

Discuss how the instructor maintained and managed the learning environment.

Discuss the various engagement and learning strategies that were used and how they could be implemented in different learning environments including traditional and non-traditional environments.

Discuss how you could implement some these strategies into your own classroom.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric.

Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Nurs 646E – Nursing Education Seminar 1

Rubric:

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
NUR-646E	NUR-646E-O500	Learning Environment Observation	100.0

Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)	4: Good (92.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
ELEOT	5.0%	A completed ELEOT is included.	N/A	N/A	N/A	A completed ELEOT is included.

ELEOT Results	10.0%	A discussion of the ELEOT results is not included.	A discussion of the ELEOT results is incomplete or incorrect.	A discussion of the ELEOT results is included but lacks supporting details.	A discussion of the ELEOT results is complete and includes supporting details.	A discussion of the ELEOT results is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

Learning Environment	15.0%	A discussion of how the instructor maintained and managed the learning environment is not included.	A discussion of how the instructor maintained and managed the learning environment is incomplete or incorrect.	A discussion of how the instructor maintained and managed the learning environment is included but lacks supporting details.	A discussion of how the instructor maintained and managed the learning environment is complete and includes supporting details.	A discussion of how the instructor maintained and managed the learning environment is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

Engagement and Learning Strategies	20.0%	A discussion of the various engagement and learning strategies used and how they could be implemented into various settings is not included.	A discussion of the various engagement and learning strategies used and how they could be implemented into various settings is incomplete or incorrect.	A discussion of the various engagement and learning strategies used and how they could be implemented into various settings is included but lacks supporting details.	A discussion of the various engagement and learning strategies used and how they could be implemented into various settings is complete and includes supporting details.	A discussion of the various engagement and learning strategies used and how they could be implemented into various settings is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

Strategy Implementation	20.0%	A discussion on how the strategies observed could be implemented is not included.	A discussion on how the strategies observed could be implemented is incomplete or incorrect.	A discussion on how the strategies observed could be implemented is included but lacks supporting details.	A discussion on how the strategies observed could be implemented is complete and includes supporting details.	A discussion on how the strategies observed could be implemented is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.


Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%	Nurs 646E – Nursing Education Seminar 1
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
			Nurs 646E – Nursing Education Seminar 1

Format	10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
				Nurs 646E – Nursing Education Seminar 1
Total Weightage	100%