NUR-590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper
NUR-590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper
Throughout this course, you have developed a formal, evidence-based practice proposal.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NUR-590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper
Just from $13/Page
The proposal is the plan for an evidence-based practice project designed to address a problem, issue, or concern in the professional work setting. Although several types of evidence can be used to support a proposed solution, a sufficient and compelling base of support from valid research studies is required as the major component of that evidence. Proposals must be submitted in a format suitable for obtaining formal approval in the work setting. Proposals will vary in length depending upon the problem or issue addressed (3,500 and 5,000 words). The cover sheet, abstract, references pages, and appendices are not included in the word count.
Section headings for each section component are required. Evaluation of the proposal in all sections will be based upon the extent to which the depth of content reflects graduate-level critical thinking skills.
This project contains seven formal sections:
- Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
- Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
- Section C: Solution Description
- Section D: Change Model
- Section E: Implementation Plan
- Section F: Evaluation of Process
Each section (A-F) will be submitted as a separate assignment in Topics 1-6 so your instructor can provide feedback (refer to applicable topics for complete descriptions of each section).
The final paper submission in Topic 7 will consist of the completed project (with revisions to all sections), title page, abstract, compiled references list, and appendices. Appendices will include a conceptual model for the project, handouts, data and evaluation collection tools, a budget, a timeline, resource lists, and approval forms, as previously assigned in individual section assignments.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the , located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Writer:
Please be sure to read all comments and make all corrections to documents. Please add the conceptual model for the project. In addition, please make sure the reference section is correct as noted on comments of instructor on the paper.
Again, this instructor is a very hard grader. This paper is worth 250 points. Please lets make it happen and make an “A”.
I am a student at Grand Canyon University. Please do not duplicate any previous students work.
Attached is all the papers A-F, please make corrections as noted on papers and rubric. Read Comments.
Please read guidelines and make all corrections.
NUR-590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper
RUBRIC
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| NUR-590 | NUR-590-O102 | Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper | 250.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) | Satisfactory (88.00%) | Good (92.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Translation of Research and Knowledge Gained From Practice, While Adhering to Ethical Research Standards, to Improve Patient Outcomes and Clinical Practice (1.1) | 15.0% | Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is not included. | Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is present. | Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is clearly provided and well developed. | Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Application of Theoretical Frameworks From Nursing and Other Disciplines to Make Decisions Regarding Practice and Health-Related Problems at the Individual and Population Level (1.2) | 15.0% | Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not included. | Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is present. | Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is clearly provided and well developed. | Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Assessment of Health Care Processes and Systems to Recommend Measures for Improving Quality, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness Across an Organization (3.1) | 10.0% | An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is not included. | An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is present. | An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Integration of Appropriate Information and Communication Technologies to Improve Nursing Practice and Care Delivery for Individuals and Populations (3.3) | 10.0% | An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is not included. | An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is present. | An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Design of Ethically Sound, Evidence-Based Solutions to Complex Health Care Issues Related to Individuals, Populations, and Systems of Care (5.1) | 10.0% | Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is not included. | Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is present. | Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is clearly provided and well developed. | Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Evaluation of Process | 5.0% | An evaluation of process is not included. | An evaluation of process is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | An evaluation of process is present. | An evaluation of process is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive evaluation of process is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Required Sources | 5.0% | Sources are not included. | Number of required sources is only partially met. | Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | ||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% | NUR-590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper |
