NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper

NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper

NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper

The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The three most essential components of the psychiatric interview are Psychiatric and medical history, substance use and abuse history, and mental status examination (MSE). Psychiatric and medical history is vital because it helps identify the patient’s past emotional or mental disturbances, Psychosomatic disorders, medical conditions, and neurologic disorders often associated with psychiatric disorders (Tatayeva et al., 2022). Besides, identifying past psychiatric and medical conditions guides the practitioner on the appropriate treatment interventions.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The substance use and abuse history since mental disorders are linked with substance use disorders (SUDs). Substance use triggers changes in brain structure and function, increasing the risk of a person developing a mental disorder Patients with mental disorders, like anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), often take drugs or alcohol as a form of self-medication (Kaswa, 2021). Besides, drugs and alcohol worsen symptoms of mental disorders like schizophrenia and depression. The MSE is crucial since it provides information about a patient’s appearance, speech, actions, and thoughts (Martin et al., 2020). It helps to assess the patient’s thinking, feeling, and behavior, which guides in making a psychiatric diagnosis.

The Simple Delusional Syndrome Scale (SDSS) comprises seven items: Logical organization, stability, systemization, conviction, influence on the action, extension, and insertion. The scale is scored from 1-5. Forgácová (2008) performed a statistical analysis that found good psychometric characteristics of the SDSS with a Cronbach coefficient alpha=0.8327. The SDSS has been designed to measure the level of intensity of the delusional syndrome in patients whose clinical examination has established the delusional syndrome. The scale’s structure and the selection of the scale’s items are determined by clinical experience and the theoretical fundament obtained from essential works. The SDSS can help the NP assess changes in delusional syndromes based on the therapeutic effect of psychopharmacological agents.

References

Forgácová, L. (2008). Delusion assessment scales. Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica : a Magyar Pszichofarmakologiai Egyesulet lapja = official journal of the Hungarian Association of Psychopharmacology10(1), 23–30.

Kaswa, R. (2021). Primary healthcare approach to substance abuse management. South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care63(1), e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5307

Martin, A., Jacobs, A., Krause, R., & Amsalem, D. (2020). The Mental Status Exam: An Online Teaching Exercise Using Video-Based Depictions by Simulated Patients. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources16, 10947. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10947

Tatayeva, R., Ossadchaya, E., Sarculova, S., Sembayeva, Z., & Koigeldinova, S. (2022). Psychosomatic Aspects of The Development of Comorbid Pathology: A Review. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran36, 152. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.36.152

ORDER A CUSTOM PAPER HERE NOW

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you will synthesize the independent evidence-based practice project proposal assignments from NUR-550 and NUR-590 into a 4,500-5,000-word professional paper.

Final Paper

The final paper should:

Incorporate all necessary revisions and corrections suggested by your instructors.

Synthesize the different elements of the overall project into one paper. The synthesis should reflect the main concepts for each section, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and be rewritten to include the critical aspects (do not copy and paste the assignments).

Contain supporting research for the evidence-based practice project proposal.

Main Body of the Paper

The main body of your paper should include the following sections:

Problem Statement

Organizational Culture and Readiness

Literature Review

Change Model, or Framework

Implementation Plan

Evaluation Plan

Appendices

The appendices at the end of your paper should include the following:

All final changes or revisions for the drafts that will be included in the appendices of your paper.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as the final appendix at the end of your paper. In each preceding course you have been directed to the Student Success Center for assistance with APA style, and have submitted the APA Writing Checklist to help illustrate your adherence to APA style. This final paper should demonstrate a clear ability to communicate your project in a professional and accurately formatted paper using APA style.

General Requirements

You are required to cite 10-12 peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

1.1: Translate research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice.

5.1: Design ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care.

ORDER A CUSTOM PAPER HERE NOW

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total150 points

Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
Synthesis

Synthesis Paragraphs are logically sequenced, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and are rewritten to present a fluid and cohesive paper.

0 points

Synthesis is not evident. The paper consists of a cut-and-paste of the previous assignments. Revision based on instructor feedback is not included.

9.6 points

Synthesis is sporadic. Overall, the paper fails to organize paragraphs in a logical sequence and connect ideas or overreaching concepts in a fluid and cohesive paper.

10.56 points

Synthesis is generally evident. The paper organizes most paragraphs in a logical sequence and generally connects ideas or overreaching concepts. Some paragraphs require better transitions to create a fluid and cohesive paper.

11.04 points

Synthesis is evident. The paper organizes paragraphs in a logical sequence and connects ideas or overreaching concepts. Overall, the paper applies transitions and the paper is fluid and cohesive.

12 points

Synthesis is excellent. The paper organizes paragraphs in a logical sequence and connects ideas or overreaching concepts. The paper is well-developed, fluid, and cohesive.

Organizational Culture and Readiness

Organizational Culture and Readiness Culture, degree of readiness, challenges to implementation, strategies for implementation, stakeholder involvement, communication strategies.

0 points

A description of the organizational culture and readiness is not included.

8.4 points

An incomplete description of the organizational culture, readiness, and some organizational challenges is presented. Strategies for the overall implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are incomplete.

9.24 points

The organizational culture, readiness, and some organizational challenges, are summarized. General strategies for the overall implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.

9.66 points

The organizational culture and readiness are discussed and information on the organizational challenges is presented. Strategies for communication, stakeholder involvement, and the implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are presented. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided.

10.5 points

The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and insight into the organization challenges is presented. Clear strategies for communication, stakeholder involvement, and the implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are presented. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.

Problem Statement (B)

Problem Statement (C5.1a)

0 points

The problem statement is not used throughout the paper. In general, evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem is not provided.

9.6 points

The problem statement is inconsistently presented throughout the paper. Evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem is missing in many aspects.

10.56 points

The problem statement is mostly consistent throughout the paper and, in most instances, uses evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.

11.04 points

The problem statement is consistent throughout the paper and describes the issue using evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.

12 points

The problem statement is consistent throughout the paper and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.

Literature Review

Literature Review

0 points

Supporting literature from the literature review is not evident. Clear rationale for how the research supports the PICOT is not presented.

8.4 points

The supporting literature from the literature review is inconsistently used in the paper to provide evidence. The articles do not provide clear rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.

9.24 points

The supporting literature from the literature review is used throughout most of the paper to provide evidence. The articles are used to provide general rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.

9.66 points

The supporting literature from the literature review is synthesized and used throughout the paper to provide evidence. The main components of the articles are used to provide rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.

10.5 points

The supporting literature from the literature review is organized and synthesized strategically throughout the paper to provide convincing evidence. The main components of the articles are used to provide substantial rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.

Change Model or Framework

Change Model or Framework

0 points

The selected model or framework and its application for implementation are not described.

8.4 points

The selected model or framework and its application for implementation are incomplete.

9.24 points

The selected model or framework and its general application for implementation are outlined.

9.66 points

The selected model or framework and its application for the key aspects of the proposed implementation are described.

10.5 points

The selected model or framework and its application for the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.

Implementation Plan (B)

Plan includes setting/access to subjects; timeline; budget and resources; research design; methods instruments; process for delivering intervention; stakeholders; barriers and challenges. (C5.1b)

0 points

The implementation plan is not described.

8.4 points

The implementation plan is incomplete.

9.24 points

The implementation plan is generally described. Information for some key aspects is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.

9.66 points

The implementation plan is described and provides key information for the various aspects. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided.

10.5 points

The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.

Evaluation Plan

Evaluation Plan Plan includes expected outcomes, data collection tools, statistical test, methods applied to data collection tool, strategies for nonpositive outcomes, plans for maintaining, extending, revising and discontinuing proposed solution.

0 points

The evaluation plan is not described.

8.4 points

The evaluation plan is incomplete.

9.24 points

The evaluation plan is generally described. Information for some key aspects is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.

9.66 points

The evaluation plan is described and provides key information for the various aspects. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided.

10.5 points

The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.

Associated Documents and Appendix

Associated Documents and Appendix Appendix includes consent or approval form; timeline; budget and resource list; method or instrument; APA Writing Checklist.

0 points

The appendix and required resources are omitted.

7.2 points

The required resources are attached, but an appendix has not been created. Some resources contain errors and have not been revised. The paper does not reflect the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.

7.92 points

The resources have been revised, but there are one or two minor errors. The resources are attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.

8.28 points

The resources are revised accordingly and attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.

9 points

The resources are accurate and attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was effectively used in development of the paper.

Ability to Translate Research and Knowledge to Improve Patient Outcomes and Practice (B)

Ability to translate research and knowledge to improve patient outcomes and practice (C1.1)

0 points

The final paper does not adhere to ethical research standards. The ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice is not demonstrated.

9.6 points

The final paper is inconsistent in its adherence to ethical research standards. The ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice is not consistently demonstrated.

10.56 points

The final paper observes ethical research standards, but there are some aspects of the paper that need more detail or information. A general ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice is demonstrated.

11.04 points

The final paper observes ethical research standards and demonstrates an ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice.

12 points

The final paper clearly adheres to ethical research standards and demonstrates a strong ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice.

Required Sources

Required Sources

0 points

Sources are not included.

6 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

6.6 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

6.9 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

7.5 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

8.4 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

9.24 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

9.66 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

10.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

9.6 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

10.56 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

11.04 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

12 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

6.6 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

6.9 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format

Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

6 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. The organizational culture and the degree to which it supports change is thoroughly discussed. The various aspects of the culture are included. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided.

6.6 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

6.9 points

Template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

7.5 points

All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

6 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

6.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

6.9 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.


Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Medicine
Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE ADVOCATE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM
The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!
Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022
Medicine
Well researched paper. Excellent work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
This was done very well. Thank you!
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time
Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023
Medicine
Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat