NUR-550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal PICOT Assignment
NUR-550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal PICOT Assignment
NUR-550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal PICOT Assignment
Assessment Description
PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) is a method that helps clarify the qualities needed to create a good question out of a practice issue or problem affecting a population of focus.
The purpose of this assignment is to complete your PICOT for your selected nursing practice problem. Refer to your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem” assignment from Topic 1 to complete this assignment. If your nursing practice problem or PICOT required revision, include those revisions in this assignment. The final PICOT you develop in this assignment will provide the framework for developing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Use the “PICOT-Final” template to complete this assignment.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite at least four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Attachments
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
NUR-550-RS3-EBP PICOT Final.docx
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT – Rubric
LIST
GRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total
75 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3. Satisfactory
4. Good
5. Excellen
Mechanics of Writing
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
3 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
3.3 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
3.45 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3.75 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Problem Statement
Problem Statement
0 points
A problem statement is not included.
12 points
The problem statement is incomplete.
13.2 points
The problem statement is generally presented. There are some inaccuracies. More support is needed to justify or rationalize the problem.
13.8 points
The problem statement is presented. Adequate support is provided to justify or rationalize the problem.
15 points
The problem statement concisely describes the issue using strong support to rationalize and justify the problem.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
3 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
3.3 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
3.45 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3.75 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Timeline
Timeline
0 points
A description of the timeline is not included.
6 points
A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.
6.6 points
A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.
6.9 points
A description of the timelines is complete and includes sufficient evidence.
7.5 points
A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.
Intervention (Revision)
Intervention (Revision)
0 points
The proposed intervention is not described, or the required revisions were not made for the described intervention.
4.8 points
NA
5.28 points
Revisions were made accordingly for the proposed intervention, but some information or detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.
5.52 points
NA
6 points
The proposed intervention is clearly described and relevant to the nursing practice problem and population. No revision was needed.
Required Sources
Required Sources
0 points
Sources are not included.
3 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.
3.3 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
3.45 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
3.75 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Outcome
Outcome
0 points
A description of the outcome is not included.
6 points
A description of the outcome is not included.
6.6 points
A description of the outcome is included but lacks evidence.
6.9 points
A description of the outcome is complete and includes sufficient evidence.
7.5 points
A description of the outcome is extremely thorough with substantial evidence
Population (Revision)
Population (Revision)
0 points
The population is not described, or the required revisions were not made for the population description.
4.2 points
NA
4.62 points
Revisions were made accordingly for the population description, but some information or detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.
4.83 points
NA
5.25 points
The population is thoroughly and accurately described. No revision was needed.
Comparison
Comparison
0 points
A description of the comparison information is not included.
6 points
A description of the comparison information is incomplete or incorrect.
6.6 points
A description of the comparison information is included but lacks evidence and measurable outcomes.
6.9 points
A description of the comparison information is complete and includes sufficient evidence and measurable outcomes.
7.5 points
A description of the comparison information is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and measurable outcomes.
PICOT
PICOT
0 points
The PICOT statement is omitted.
12 points
The PICOT statement is incomplete.
13.2 points
The PICOT statement is presented but there some inaccuracies.
13.8 points
The PICOT statement is presented. Some detail is needed.
15 points
The PICOT statement concisely and accurately describes the problem.
