NRS 451 Professionalism and Social Media Assignment Paper
NRS 451 Professionalism and Social Media Assignment Paper
NRS 451 Professionalism and Social Media Assignment Paper
Professionalism and Social Media
The use of social media among nurses and nurse students is essential for both personal and professional lives as the various platforms allow them to communicate and share happy moments with their families, friends, and colleagues. Social media facilitates professional networking by allowing nurses to connect and interact with colleagues. Smart et al. (2022) pose that while social media has many benefits for nurses and nursing students, it also presents challenges that can contradict professional guidelines issued by regulatory bodies like the National Council of State Boards of Nursing and professional associations like the American Nurses Association (ANA). The purpose of this paper is to review and describe my social media platforms to ascertain if they contain items that are unprofessional and could be detrimental to my career as well as have negative effects on the reputation of the nursing field.
ORDER A CUSTOM PAPER NOW
Inappropriate Posts and Conversations
I analyzed the various social media platforms that I use like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to identify posts and conversations that could be classified as inappropriate based on expected ethical and professional guidelines and requirements. For instance, in one post on Facebook, I celebrated finishing a night shift that morning by captioning the procedures that we had involving an emergency case of a teen girl who had presented with difficulty in breathing and got scared. However, the diagnosis revealed that she only had a rise in blood pressure due to prolonged anxiety and stress. We laughed off such a situation that had made us worried. I explained that the patient had made our nigh uncomfortable and should be serious next time. As I celebrated the shift end, I realized that such a post was unprofessional because as a nurse, I have a duty to offer care to patients. I also complained in the post that nursing is involving and a profession aimed at draining all energy. Another post on a different day shows use of profane language in relation to a patient who was uncivil and almost engaging in an altercation with a colleague. These posts were unprofessional since, I am expected to uphold certain standards to protect the nursing practice, profession, personal reputation and image and above patient’s privacy and confidentiality.
Responsibility in Upholding Standards of Conduct & HIPAA
Nurses have an obligation to maintain and uphold standards of conduct consistent with the requirements and guidelines governing the profession while at work and in their personal lives for many reasons. Firstly, the standards guide and promote nursing practice and should not be breached. Secondly, the set standards aim at promoting patient safety and privacy as well as making nurses accountable for their decisions and actions. Thirdly, these standards are critical to improving nurses’ competency and level of care offered to patients and health populations (Smart et al., 2022). Privacy and confidentiality requirements, especially under the Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPAA)’s protected health information, implore providers not to disclose patient health information without their express consent.
Upholding professional standards is essential at personal level since such aspects help nurses to make better decisions in care provision. Personal standards of conduct like having concern for patients is important because it demonstrates respect and upholding of patient’s privacy. Nurses should not post patient’s health information because such actions abridge their core duty of protecting them and ensuring quality care outcomes (Lefebvre et al., 2020). inappropriate conduct, especially through poor use of social media, damages one’s professional reputation and image. Nurses also become susceptible to fines, job losses, and even permanent or temporary revocation of their licenses.
The use of profane language, infringement on patient confidentiality and privacy, images depicting intoxication or sexually suggestive aspects and disparaging comments concerning patients and even employers has serious implications on one’s care and the nursing profession (Sushim et al., 2023). The implication is that nurses must be cognizant of these aspects and focus on effective personal conduct that befits the profession.
Social Media Activity Reflecting Christian Values
Christian values are essential for nurses as they deal with patients from different background, some practicing Christianity. Respect for human value and dignity of all individual is a core aspect of Christian value system as they believe that all are equal and created in God’s image. The inherent dignity of human beings should not be curtailed due to their diversity (Vukušić Rukavina et al., 2021). The areas of the social media activity reflecting Christian values include posts that I had about going to church and the significance of the sermon on that day, and images of sharing several verses from the bible and preaching by known tele-evangelists. These posts are inspiring and help patients to keep hope alive knowing that God can change their situations.
The areas of my social media activity that require improvement include stopping to use profane language, ensuring that I project the nursing profession as important and focused on improving patient care (Weiss et al., 2019). I also need to improve messaging on these platforms to include more inspirational and motivational materials and encourage patients to embrace diversity when dealing with providers, especially those different from their ethnic or racial composition.
Conclusion
The use of social media presents a delicate balancing act for nurses based on the professional and regulatory requirements. As they use these platforms for various activities at personal and professional levels, nurses must keep in mind that there are regulations and any violation can be costly; both in short and long-term. The implication is that they must honor the ethical and legal requirements and the professional responsibility of using these platforms.
References
Smart, A., McMullan, J., Mitchell, G., Small, R., & Creighton, L. (2022). Professionalism in
nursing 5: social media and e-professionalism. Nursing times, 118(8), 1-3.
Lefebvre, C., McKinney, K., Glass, C., Cline, D., Franasiak, R., Husain, I., … & Stopyra, J.
(2020). Social media usage among nurses: perceptions and practices. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(3), 135-141. DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000857.
Vukušić Rukavina, T., Viskić, J., Machala Poplašen, L., Relić, D., Marelić, M., Jokic, D., &
Sedak, K. (2021). Dangers and benefits of social media on e-professionalism of health care professionals: scoping review. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(11), e25770. DOI: 10.2196/25770
Sushim, K., & Abhay, G. (2023). Social Media Role and Its Impact on Public Health: A
Narrative Review. Cureus, 15(1). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33737.
Weiss, S., Tappen, R., & Grimley, K. (2019). Essentials of Nursing Leadership & Management.
Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Points
74
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Social media plays a significant role in the lives of nurses in both their professional and personal lives. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates. Inappropriate or unethical conduct on social media can create legal problems for nurses as well as the field of nursing.
Login to all social media sites in which you engage. Review your profile, pictures and posts. Based on the professional standards of nursing, identify items that would be considered unprofessional and potentially detrimental to your career and that negatively impact the reputation of the nursing field.
In 500-750 words, summarize the findings of your review. Include the following:
Describe the posts or conversations in which you have engaged that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.
Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with the standards governing the profession of nursing at work and in their personal lives. Include discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Provide an example of each to support your answer.
Based on the analysis of your social media, discuss what areas of your social media activity reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals. Describe areas of your social media activity that could be improved.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Rubric Criteria
Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All
Argument Logic and Construction
3.7 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
3.7 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
3.29 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
2.92 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.78 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Human Value and Dignity for Others Consistent with a Christian Worldview (MC3
14.8 points
Criteria Description
Human Value and Dignity for Others Consistent with a Christian Worldview (MC3
5.Excellent
14.8 points
A discussion of areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. The discussion demonstrates inclusiveness by respecting human value and dignity for all individuals regardless of differences. Specific areas for improvement have been suggested. The discussion is honest and demonstrates accountability for personal actions.
4. Good
13.17 points
A discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. In general, the discussion demonstrates inclusiveness by respecting human value and dignity for different groups. General areas for improvement have been suggested.
3. Satisfactory
11.69 points
A general discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. Some areas for improvement have been suggested.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
11.1 points
An incomplete discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. No areas for improvement have been clearly suggested.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals is omitted.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
1.48 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
1.48 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
1.32 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
1.17 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
1.11 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Nurse Responsibility to Uphold a Standard of Conduct
29.6 points
Criteria Description
Nurse Responsibility to Uphold a Standard of Conduct Consistent With Nursing Profession in Personal Life
5. Excellent
29.6 points
The discussion demonstrates an overall understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its implications for patients and the field of nursing. The discussion explains how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Clear examples are given.
4. Good
26.34 points
The analysis and discussion demonstrate an overall understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its implications for patients and the field of nursing. The discussion summarizes how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. General examples are given.
3. Satisfactory
23.38 points
A more in-depth discussion on the appropriateness of social media activity based on nursing standards is needed. The discussion demonstrates a broad understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and the consequence for inappropriate behavior causing harm.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
22.2 points
The discussion fails to demonstrate an understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its consequence for causing harm to patients, nursing practice, or personal employment.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA, or be considered unethical or unprofessional as a nurse, is omitted.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
3.7 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
3.7 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
3.29 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
2.92 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.78 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Assessment of Social Media Identifying Unprofessional Items
14.8 points
Criteria Description
Assessment of Social Media Identifying Unprofessional Items
5. Excellent
14.8 points
A detailed and transparent analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented.
4. Good
13.17 points
An analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented.
3. Satisfactory
11.69 points
A general analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented but is unclear in some areas.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
11.1 points
A partial analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity, based on standards of nursing practice, is not clear; or the analysis fails to incorporate the standards of nursing practice appropriately.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity, based on professional standards of nursing, is omitted.
The is Development and Purpose
3.7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
3.7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
3.29 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
2.92 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.78 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Documentation of Sources
2.22 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
2.22 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
1.98 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
1.75 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
1.67 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
