NRNP 665 ETHICAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF PMHNP CARE ASSIGNMENT

Author:

January 5th, 2024

NRNP 665 ETHICAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF PMHNP CARE ASSIGNMENT

ETHICAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF PMHNP CARE

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on

NRNP 665 ETHICAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF PMHNP CARE ASSIGNMENT

Just from $13/Page

Order Essay

Advanced practice nursing in all specialties is guided by codes of ethics that put the care, rights, duty, health, and safety of the patient first and foremost. PMHNP practice is also guided by ethical codes specifically for psychiatry. These ethical codes are frameworks to guide clinical decision making; they are generally not prescriptive. They also represent the aspirational ideals for the profession. Laws, on the other hand, dictate the requirements that must be followed. In this way, legal codes may be thought to represent the minimum standards of care, and ethics represent the highest goals for care.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

For this Discussion, you select a topic that has both legal and ethical implications for PMHNP practice and then perform a literature review on the topic. Your goal will be to identify the most salient legal and ethical facets of the issue for PMHNP practice, and also how these facets differ in the care of adult patients versus children. Keep in mind as you research your issue, that laws differ by state and your clinical practice will be dictated by the laws that govern your state.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statementsLinks to an external site.. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-for-nurses/coe-view-only/Links to an external site.

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and diagnostic formulationLinks to an external site.. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/Links to an external site.

American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. (2014). Code of ethicsLinks to an external site.. https://www.aacap.org/App_Themes/AACAP/docs/about_us/transparency_portal/aacap_code_of_ethics_2012.pdfLinks to an external site.

American Psychiatric Nurses Association. (2020). APRN psychiatric-mental health nursing practiceLinks to an external site.. https://www.apna.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageID=3846Links to an external site.

Anderson, S. L. (2012).Practice parameter on gay, lesbian, or bisexual sexual orientation, gender nonconformity, and gender discordance in children and adolescentsLinks to an external site.. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(9). 957–974. https://www.jaacap.org/action/showPdf?pii=S0890-8567%2812%2900500-XLinks to an external site.

Hilt, R. J., & Nussbaum, A. M. (2016). DSM-5 pocket guide for child and adolescent mental healthLinks to an external site.. American Psychiatric Association Publishing.

Chapter 2, “Addressing Behavioral and Mental Problems in Community Settings”Links to an external site.

Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

Chapter 19, “Legal Issues in the Care and Treatment of Children with Mental Health Problems”

Zakhari, R. (2020). The psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner certification review manual. Springer.

Chapter 1, “Preparing to Pass the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Certification Exam”

TO PREPARE

Select one of the following ethical/legal topics:

Autonomy

Beneficence

Justice

Fidelity

Veracity

Involuntary hospitalization and due process of civil commitment

Informed assent/consent and capacity

Duty to warn

Restraints

HIPPA

Child and elder abuse reporting

Tort law

Negligence/malpractice

In the Walden library, locate a total of four scholarly, professional, or legal resources related to this topic. One should address ethical considerations related to this topic for adults, one should be on ethical considerations related to this topic for children/adolescents, one should be on legal considerations related to this topic for adults, and one should be on legal considerations related to this topic for children/adolescents.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 2

Briefly identify the topic you selected. Then, summarize the articles you selected, explaining the most salient ethical and legal issues related to the topic as they concern psychiatric-mental health practice for children/adolescents and for adults. Explain how this information could apply to your clinical practice, including specific implications for practice within your state. Attach the PDFs of your articles.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 2

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by sharing cultural considerations that may impact the legal or ethical issues present in their articles.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

NRNP_6665_Week2_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 to >39.0 ptsExcellent

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s)… Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources… No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least three current credible sources

39 to >34.0 ptsGood

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s)… Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least three credible references

34 to >30.0 ptsFair

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s)… One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed… Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis… Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… Post is supported by fewer than two credible references

30 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s)… Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria… Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis… Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… Contains only one or no credible references

44 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Writing

6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent

Written clearly and concisely… Contains no grammatical or spelling errors… Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 to >4.0 ptsGood

Written concisely… May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors… Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style with minor errors

4 to >3.0 ptsFair

Written somewhat concisely… May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Contains some APA formatting errors

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Not written clearly or concisely… Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Timely and full participation

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts main Discussion by due date

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

Posts main Discussion by due date… Meets requirements for full participation

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Posts main Discussion by due date

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post main Discussion by due date

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources

9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings… Responds to questions posed by faculty… The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Writing

6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources… Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources… Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair

Response posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication…. Responses to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Timely and full participation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date…

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Posts by due date

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources

9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty… The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Writing

6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent

5 to >4.0 ptsGood

4 to >3.0 ptsFair

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication…. Responses to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Timely and full participation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Posts by due date

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Calculate the price

Make an order in advance and get the best price

Type of paper

Academic level

Deadline

Pages (550 words)

$0.00

*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.

Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.

We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.

How it works

Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service

step 1

Upload your instructions

Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.

step 2

Control the process

Once you place an order with our professional essay writing services, we will email you login details to your account. There, you'll communicate with the writer and support team and track the writer's progress.

step 3

Download your paper on time

As soon as your work is ready, we’ll notify you via email. You'll then be able to download it from your account and request a revision if needed. Please note that you can also rate the writer's work in your account.

Pro service tips

How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly

One writer throughout the entire course

If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.

The same paper from different writers

You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."

Copy of sources used by the writer

Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.

Testimonials

See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider

Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE ADVOCATE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM

The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!

Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022

Medicine

Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow

Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022

Medicine

This was done very well. Thank you!

Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022

Medicine

Well researched paper. Excellent work

Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022

Medicine

Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time

Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023

Medicine

Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work

Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022

11,595

Customer reviews in total

96%

Current satisfaction rate

3 pages

Average paper length

37%

Customers referred by a friend

OUR GIFT TO YOU

15% OFF your first order

Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.

Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat