NRNP 6645 WEEkK 8 PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS ASSIGNMENT PAPER
NRNP 6645 WEEkK 8 PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS ASSIGNMENT PAPER
NRNP 6645 WEEkK 8 PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS ASSIGNMENT PAPER
Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
• American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disordersLinks to an external site. (5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
o “Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis”
• Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
o Chapter 9, “Motivational Interviewing”
o Chapter 19, “Psychotherapeutic Approaches for Addictions and Related Disorders”
Required Media
• AllCEUs Counseling Education. (2017, November 4). 187 models of treatment for addiction | Addiction counselor training seriesLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQkA0mIWx8A
• Medmastery. (2022, March 8). How to use motivational interviewing in addiction medicineLinks to an external site.. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_wceN5DX7E
To prepare:
• Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating addictive disorders. As you watch the 187 Models of Treatment for Addiction video, consider what treatment model you may use the most with clients presenting with addiction.
• Search the Walden Library databases and choose a research article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.
THE ASSIGNMENT
• Provide an overview of the article you selected.
o What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?
o What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already studied?
o What were the author’s claims?
• Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
• Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
• Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Provide references to your sources on your last slide. Be sure to include the article you used as the basis for this Assignment.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
| Develop a 5- to 10- slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.•Provide an overview of the article you selected, including:What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used?
What were the author’s claims? |
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent 90%– 100% The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population….. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied….. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims. |
17 to >15.0 pts
Good 80%–89% The presentation defines the considered population…………………….. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied….. The response includes a description of the author’s claims. |
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair 70%–79% There is an incomplete definition of the considered population…………………….. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described……………………. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims. |
13 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69% There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing. |
20 pts |
|
| o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why? | 25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%– 100% The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article…… The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89% The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article…………….. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79% The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article…………….. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69% The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing. |
25 pts |
|
| • Explain whether the limitations of the study | 25 to >22.0 pts | 22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89% |
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79% |
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69% |
25 pts | |
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||||
| might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. | Excellent 90%–
100% The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. |
The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. | The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. | The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing. | |||||
| • Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides. | 10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%– 100% The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides. |
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%– 89% The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides. |
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79% The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies. |
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69% The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included. |
10 pts |
||||
| • Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide. | 10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%– 100% The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer- reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. |
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89% The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. |
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79% The presentation is supported with two or three peer- reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide. |
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69% The presentation is not supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence- based, scholarly sources, and/or the reference list is missing. |
10 pts |
||||
| Written Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded.
Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long |
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%– 100% Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%– 89% Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79% Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards |
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69% Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for |
5 pts | ||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||
| and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. | flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. | for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%– 79% of the time. | flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | ||||
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%– 89% Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79% Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69% Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|||
|
Total Points: 100 |
||||||||
