General Motors (Kuppler, 2014)

General Motors (Kuppler, 2014)

General Motors (Kuppler, 2014)

Permalink:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
General Motors (Kuppler, 2014)
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The organization discussed in the case study is General Motors (Kuppler, 2014). This is one of the largest automotive companies in the United States. In the recent past, the company has not been very kingly in their manner of execution. The latest and biggest scandal so far has been the ignition switch recall. This is the main issue discussed in the article. The company was forced to recall over 12 million cars in 2014. The faulty ignition switches used by the company in certain models of their cars were the cause of more than 13 deaths. In the article, the company is painted as one undergoing a culture crisis. This is because the faulty parts have been used in models for over a decade now and the recall was done too late.

Strengths and weaknesses

For many years, General Motors has been a giant in the automotive industry. Before filing for bankruptcy back in 2009, the company had the highest recorded sales even higher that Toyota. General Motors has however been run in a bureaucratic manner that has led to the fall of a formerly great company. Among the weaknesses cited are two cultures known as the GM nod where members of management listen and nod when assigned to perform a duty but they never do it. The other was the GM salute where members fail to take responsibility and instead point to someone else. In other words, playing the game (Tetzeli, 2016).

Organizational modelling

Initially, the company adopted a hybrid model with some Autocratic and custodial features. GM workers could spot the defective ignition switch, and through the years they raised some concerns to their immediate superiors showing the custodial model. However, there had been orders passed from top management that cutting costs must be the primary objective. Switching the ignition switches would have gone against this objective, and therefore people in lower management chose to ignore the problem rather than be the bearer of bad news. This showed the autocratic model where information only flows in one way (Shethna, 2016).

Comparison

The model engaged at GM was characteristic in the automotive industry. Toyota, for example, has a board of 29 Japanese men who run the whole company. Executives based in the US have no powers to order for a recall or to stop production without the authorization of a board member above him. Given the Just in Time model employed by the company, the production of defective products is very high if the people on the ground do not have the authority to correct the mistakes immediately (Bauer & Erdogan, 2014). This was seen a few years ago when some Toyota models were unintentionally speeding, and this led to the largest fine the company has paid to the regulatory boards. The fine as of 1.2 billion dollars. Ford is another company that was also run by a handful of executives, though under the leadership of its previous CEO the company was able to change its culture (Lombardo, 2017). This saw the realization of better profit margins and better customer satisfaction. The automotive industry is slowly switching to organizational models that have a more holistic approach. They are trying to create an environment where the employees feel just as important as their managers, and this will lead to better products and higher levels of responsibility from each member.

Impact of culture

In the past, employees were more concerned about earning a living and being able to feed their families. This led to the development of autocratic models where the executives barked orders, and the employees followed them without asking any questions. This translated into higher profits for the company as the employees earned minimum wage. In the present day, culture has changed, and now people seek fulfillment from their jobs. They want to know they are making a difference in the world and they want their ideas to be hard (Shethna, 2016). This has phased out autocratic models and in their place, more interactive models such as the supportive model.

GM current organizational model.

GM, just like other automotive companies has had to change their corporate model to encourage employees to be an active part of the company (LeBeau & Pohlman, 2014). The company is now encouraging employees to speak up about any concerns especially those that will boost customer safety. There is to be a reward scheme for employees who come forward. This is to alienate any fear that used to be associated with being the carrier of bad news. The companies are embracing models which are not based on making profits at the expense of quality or safety (Tetzeli, 2016).

Motivational models

Employees have often been motivated by reward schemes employed by management. Current organizational models still use this method but have tweaked it by deputizing the employees as well. When a problem arises, if the immediate superior does not address it then the employees are tasked with forwarding it to even higher management. This surge of power acts as a great motivational tool for employees.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2014). Organizational Structure: The Case of Toyota. Retrieved from Flatworld: http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/bookhub/4?e=fwk-122425-ch14a_s01 Kuppler, T. (2014, June 8). The GM Culture Crisis: what leaders must learn from this culture case study. Retrieved from Switch and Shift: http://switchandshift.com/the-gm-culture-crisis LeBeau, P., & Pohlman, J. (2014, May 16). The corporate culture: Behind the scenes at General Motors. Retrieved from CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2014/05/16/the-corporate-culture-behind-the-scenes-at-general-motors.html Lombardo, J. (2017, February 5). Ford Motor Company’s Organizational Culture Analysis. Retrieved from Panmore Institute: http://panmore.com/ford-motor-company-organizational-culture-analysis Shethna, J. (2016, May 12). Best 5 Organizational Behavior Model. Retrieved from EDUCBA: https://www.educba.com/organizational-behavior-model/ Tetzeli, R. (2016, October 17). Mary Barra is remaking the culture of GM and the company itself. Retrieved from Fast Company: https://www.fastcompany.com/3064064/mary-barra-is-remaking-gms-culture-and-the-company-itself

 

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE ADVOCATE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM
The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!
Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022
Medicine
Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time
Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023
Medicine
This was done very well. Thank you!
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Well researched paper. Excellent work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat