Emergency Preparedness Assessment
Emergency Preparedness Assessment
Emergency Preparedness Assessment
Assessment Description
Analyze how your clinical/practicum organization’s emergency responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses in a 900-1,200-word essay, addressing the following:
Explain each component in the four phases of emergency management.
Describe the policies and procedures that your clinical/practicum has in place for emergency preparedness and disaster planning.
Describe local, state, and national emergency preparedness resources or plans.
Describe how your clinical/practicum organization’s responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Describe emergency services that should be made available to the population in an emergency.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Emergency Preparedness – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total65 points
| Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Phases of Emergency Management
Explanation of each component in the four phases of emergency management |
0 points
Explanation of each component in the four phases of emergency management is not present. |
7.28 points
Explanation of each component in the four phases of emergency management is incomplete or incorrect. |
8.01 points
Explanation of each component in the four phases of emergency management is present but lacks supporting details. |
8.37 points
Explanation of each component in the four phases of emergency management is complete and includes supporting details. |
9.1 points
Explanation of each component in the four phases of emergency management is thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Policies and Procedures at the Clinical/Practicum Site
Analysis of policies and procedures in place for emergency preparedness and disaster planning at clinical/practicum site, including whether the mandated regulation requirements are being met |
0 points
Analysis of policies and procedures in place for emergency preparedness and disaster planning at clinical/practicum site, including whether the mandated regulation requirements are being met, is not present. |
7.28 points
Analysis of policies and procedures in place for emergency preparedness and disaster planning at clinical/practicum site, including whether the mandated regulation requirements are being met, is incomplete or incorrect. |
8.01 points
Analysis of policies and procedures in place for emergency preparedness and disaster planning at clinical/practicum site, including whether the mandated regulation requirements are being met, is present but lacks supporting details.. |
8.37 points
Analysis of policies and procedures in place for emergency preparedness and disaster planning at clinical/practicum site, including whether the mandated regulation requirements are being met, is complete and includes supporting details. |
9.1 points
Analysis of policies and procedures in place for emergency preparedness and disaster planning at clinical/practicum site, including whether the mandated regulation requirements are being met, is thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Local, State, and National Emergency Preparedness Resources and Regulations
Description of local, state, and national emergency preparedness resources and regulations |
0 points
Description of local, state, and national emergency preparedness resources and regulations is not present. |
7.28 points
Description of local, state, and national emergency preparedness resources and regulations is incomplete or incorrect. |
8.01 points
Description of local, state, and national emergency preparedness resources and regulations is present but lacks supporting details |
8.37 points
Description of local, state, and national emergency preparedness resources and regulations is complete and includes supporting details. |
9.1 points
Description of local, state, and national emergency preparedness resources and regulations is thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Practicum Site Organization Responses
Critique of how clinical/practicum organization’s responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses. |
0 points
Critique clinical/practicum organization’s responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses is not present. |
7.28 points
Critique how clinical/practicum organization’s responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses is incomplete or incorrect. |
8.01 points
Critique how clinical/practicum organization’s responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses is present but lacks supporting details. |
8.37 points
Critique how clinical/practicum organization’s responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses is complete and includes supporting details. |
9.1 points
Critique how clinical/practicum organization’s responses coordinate with local, state, and national emergency responses is thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Additional Emergency Services
Description of services that could be added to support the population in an emergency or disaster at clinical/practicum setting |
0 points
Description of services that could be added to support the population in an emergency or disaster at clinical/practicum setting is not present. |
7.28 points
Description of services that could be added to support the population in an emergency or disaster at clinical/practicum setting is incomplete or incorrect. |
8.01 points
Description of services that could be added to support the population in an emergency or disaster at clinical/practicum setting is present but lacks supporting details. |
8.37 points
Description of services that could be added to support the population in an emergency or disaster at clinical/practicum setting is complete and includes supporting details. |
9.1 points
Description of services that could be added to support the population in an emergency or disaster at clinical/practicum setting is thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience. |
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. |
3.64 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. |
4 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. |
4.19 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. |
4.55 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience. |
| Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. |
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. |
4.16 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. |
4.58 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
4.78 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
5.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
| Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. |
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. |
2.6 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. |
2.86 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. |
2.99 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated. |
3.25 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively. |
| Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. |
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. |
2.6 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. |
2.86 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. |
2.99 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. |
3.25 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
| Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.) |
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. |
2.6 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. |
2.86 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. |
2.99 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. |
3.25 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated. |
