DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs Essay

DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs Essay

DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs Essay

Examining Methods and Designs
Data forms a vital part of research and projects. Therefore, it is important for the collected data to be verifiable and valid. Besides, verifiable and valid data is key in making conclusions. The implication is that various strategies are used to make the data valid and verifiable. For example, good research should have strong data collection, sampling techniques, and data analysis strategies that support the research or study (Singh et al., 2021). In addition, the research design also determines that quality of the study, and such designs are dictated by the type of data and the aims of the research. Therefore, it is important for a researcher to have adequate knowledge regarding research methodology and design. As such, the purpose of this assignment is to formulate a comparison of designs and methods used in three articles by using the information from the comparison table of methods and design.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs Essay
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

ORDER A CUSTOM PAPER NOW

Description of the Characteristics Associated with the Method of Each Article.
The methods used by the researchers in the three articles have various differences and characteristics. Cheng et al. (2018) used purposive sampling in selecting the approved psychiatric hospital known for offering home visits. As part of the study, there were both experimental and control groups which were vital in measuring the impact of the intervention in enhancing patient satisfaction. Therefore, the analysis of the impact of the intervention was determined using the observed difference between the control and the experimental groups. The partnership was connected to the provision of appropriate resources, enhanced communication, and improvement of daily living abilities and stabilization of disease conditions.
Gilad et al. (2020) used interviews to collect data from the study participants, where the patients and staff in the dialysis unit were interviewed. Since the researcher wanted to collect data using open-ended questions, the use of semi-structured interviews was selected. This approach was also important in studying beliefs and feelings regarding the topic in question.
As opposed to the first two articles, Zimmerman et al. (2020) used a two-phased descriptive method to collect the targeted data. The researchers used a paper-based validated questionnaire in the initial phase to obtain data from the participants. The next phase entails the use of interviews designed to cover various study topics. Therefore, the use of the two-phased approach sufficiently helped in collecting both qualitative and quantitative data.
Description of the Characteristics Associated with the Design of Each Article
The researchers also used various research designs to help achieve the study’s aims. In the first study, Cheng et al. (2018) used a quasi-experimental study design to study the impact of the intervention on the chosen study group. The quasi-experimental study design is commonly used in health research to explore the effect of a designed intervention on the behavior and health of a chosen population. The total number of participants in this study was two hundred and forty. As such, the design was most fitting as it limited a random selection of study participants.
In the next article, Gilad et al. (2020) employed a two-phase descriptive, mixed-method research design approach. The design was key in helping the researcher have an enhanced understanding of the phenomenon, experiences, and context. Through this research design, the researcher can ask questions and arrive at solutions to questions that cannot be answered numerically but are key to understanding the human experience.
Zimmerman et al. (2020) used a mixed-method study design to help achieve the study objectives. It was used as in helps increase the generalizability and precision of the study. The main advantage of combining both qualitative and quantitative study designs is that the researchers are capable of gaining a more comprehensive picture which is not possible with a single approach. Therefore, this design was used to collect data from a total of two hundred and twenty-five study participants to help achieve the study objectives.
Description of the Statistical Analysis Associated with the Method and Design of Each Article.
Data analysis is important in the interpretation of the meaning of the data and in making decisions. Cheng et al. (2018) used SPPS software for data analysis. As part of the analysis, the researchers used percentages, standard deviations, and means to describe satisfaction scores, demographics, and clinical status. T-tests are the major statistical tests used in this study to study the effect of the intervention. Therefore, it was performed between the groups, and between-group variations were noted in the demographics, clinical status, and satisfaction scores. The other statistical tests used in this study include ANOVA and chi-square.
Gilad et al. (2020) used thematic analysis to analyze their data as directed by their chosen design. The thematic analysis was key in analyzing the responses obtained from the patients and the staff. The responses were mainly on medication use and reports. From the thematic analysis, it was evident that there was a triangular relationship between the patients, physicians, and nurses on medication care and breakdowns in communication and discrepancies. On the other hand, Zimmerman et al. (2020) used percentages and means in analyzing the demographic data. As part of the analysis, they used thematic analysis of the student responses; the researcher noted satisfactory knowledge of IPC among the first and second years.

Discussion of the Reliability and Validity issues Associated with each Methodology and Design
Reliability and validity is also an important part of research. Therefore, there were various reliability and validity issues connected with each methodology and design. While Cheng et al. (2018) used content validity and Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.93 on reliability, the next article relied on content validity and internal reliability in approving the data collection instruments. Comparatively, Zimmerman et al. (2020) applied content validity and internal reliability to help in approving the data collection instruments.
Summary Comparing the Different Methods and Designs Used In the Studies
As earlier indicated, it is important for researchers to be well conversant with study design and methodology. The researchers who authored the three articles used different methods and designs to support their samples, dictated by financial resources and answered the research questions. They used different levels of measurements, data analysis strategies, validity, reliability, and population samples which could best help in achieving the study aims. The researchers also collected different kinds of data depending on the research methods and design used as well as the study aims and objectives, with a major focus on answering the research questions.
Conclusion
A total of three research articles have been analyzed and compared, especially based on the methodology and design. Each article employed a different design to help answer the research questions and achieve the study objectives. The researchers also used different statistical tests and analyses to analyze the collected data and answer the research questions.
References
Cheng, J. F., Huang, X. Y., Lin, M. C., Wang, Y. H., & Yeh, T. P. (2018). A mental health home visit service partnership intervention on improving patients’ satisfaction. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(4), 610-616.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.010
Gilad, L., Haviv, Y. S., Cohen-Glickman, I., Chinitz, D., & Cohen, M. J. (2020). Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches. BMC Nephrology, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01900-y
Singh, M., Thirsk, L., Stahlke, S., Venkatesaperumal, R., LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2021). Nursing research in Canada-E-book: methods, critical appraisal, and utilization. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Zimmerman, P. A. P., Sladdin, I., Shaban, R. Z., Gilbert, J., & Brown, L. (2020). Factors influencing hand hygiene practice of nursing students: A descriptive, mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 44, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102746

Appendix
Comparison Table of Methods and Designs
APA Reference
(Include the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.) Research Methodology and Design Setting/Sample
Setting characteristics
Sampling type (e.g., convenience, purposive, systematic)
Number of participants
Instrumentation
• Identify the instrument
• Number of questions and how they are answered (e.g., open-ended, multiple choice, Likert scale)
• Include how the data was collected. Reliability
Reliability type (e.g., interrater, test-retest, internal)

Psychometric data (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha)
Validity
Validity type (e.g., construct, content, face)
Psychometric data (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) Levels of Measurement
(Identify independent and dependent variables and the associated levels of measurements.) Data Analysis
• Statistical significance
• Analysis test used
Cheng, J. F., Huang, X. Y., Lin, M. C., Wang, Y. H., & Yeh, T. P. (2018). A mental health home visit service partnership intervention on improving patients’ satisfaction. Archives of psychiatric nursing, 32(4), 610-616.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.010 Quasi-experimental quantitative design. The research was done in a psychiatric hospital offering home visits. The researcher used purposive sampling to select the study participants. A total of 240 participants were chosen to take part in the study. The scale of Satisfaction with the Mental Health Home Visit Service of the patients was used to measure satisfaction.
The scale has 26 items on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied)
The evaluation consisted of one pre-test (one week before the intervention) and two post-tests (carried out six and 12 months after the intervention. The study’s findings are trustworthy because the scale used to gather the data is a trustworthy assessment (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.93). Content validity Level of evidence: Ordinal.
Dependent variables: Patients satisfaction
2. Independent variables: community-based and hospital-based home visit Statistical significance was identified when p < 0.05. T-test, ANOVA, and Chi-square were used
Gilad, L., Haviv, Y. S., Cohen-Glickman, I., Chinitz, D., & Cohen, M. J. (2020). Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches. BMC nephrology, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01900-y
The study used
qualitative research
design The research was conducted at Hadassah Medical Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 50 patients, 20 nurses and
eight physicians took part in the study The researcher used in-depth interviews which integrated closed and open-ended questions.
Internal reliability of the findings. Content validity Level of evidence: Nominal.
Dependent variables: patient and staff thoughts and attitudes
Independent variables: medication use A thematic analysis was used in analyzing the interviews.
Zimmerman, P. A. P., Sladdin, I., Shaban, R. Z., Gilbert, J., & Brown, L. (2020). Factors influencing hand hygiene practice of nursing students: A descriptive, mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 44, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102746 A mixed-method design was used in this research.
Students enrolling in the first three years of a Bachelor of Nursing program at an Australian institution were included in this research.
A total of 225 students participated in the study. The study used surveys where participants were asked 11 multiple-choice questions. Internal reliability. Content validity Level of evidence: Nominal.
Independent variables: elements that have an impact on how IPC and HH are practiced.
Dependent variables: IPC and HH theoretical understanding Thematic analysis was used. Categorical variables were presented as counts (percentages) and continuous variables by medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for nonparametric data. Chi-squared statistics were used to calculate dependence among categorical variables.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Examining Methods and Designs

Data forms a vital part of research and projects. Therefore, it is important for the collected data to be verifiable and valid. Besides, verifiable and valid data is key in making conclusions. The implication is that various strategies are used to make the data valid and verifiable. For example, good research should have strong data collection, sampling techniques, and data analysis strategies that support the research or study (Singh et al., 2021). In addition, the research design also determines that quality of the study, and such designs are dictated by the type of data and the aims of the research. Therefore, it is important for a researcher to have adequate knowledge regarding research methodology and design. As such, the purpose of this assignment is to formulate a comparison of designs and methods used in three articles by using the information from the comparison table of methods and design.

Description of the Characteristics Associated with the Method of Each Article.

 The methods used by the researchers in the three articles have various differences and characteristics. Cheng et al. (2018) used purposive sampling in selecting the approved psychiatric hospital known for offering home visits. As part of the study, there were both experimental and control groups which were vital in measuring the impact of the intervention in enhancing patient satisfaction. Therefore, the analysis of the impact of the intervention was determined using the observed difference between the control and the experimental groups. The partnership was connected to the provision of appropriate resources, enhanced communication, and improvement of daily living abilities and stabilization of disease conditions.

   Gilad et al. (2020) used interviews to collect data from the study participants, where the patients and staff in the dialysis unit were interviewed. Since the researcher wanted to collect data using open-ended questions, the use of semi-structured interviews was selected. This approach was also important in studying beliefs and feelings regarding the topic in question.

 As opposed to the first two articles, Zimmerman et al. (2020) used a two-phased descriptive method to collect the targeted data. The researchers used a paper-based validated questionnaire in the initial phase to obtain data from the participants. The next phase entails the use of interviews designed to cover various study topics. Therefore, the use of the two-phased approach sufficiently helped in collecting both qualitative and quantitative data.

Description of the Characteristics Associated with the Design of Each Article

  The researchers also used various research designs to help achieve the study’s aims. In the first study, Cheng et al. (2018) used a quasi-experimental study design to study the impact of the intervention on the chosen study group. The quasi-experimental study design is commonly used in health research to explore the effect of a designed intervention on the behavior and health of a chosen population. The total number of participants in this study was two hundred and forty. As such, the design was most fitting as it limited a random selection of study participants.

 In the next article, Gilad et al. (2020) employed a two-phase descriptive, mixed-method research design approach. The design was key in helping the researcher have an enhanced understanding of the phenomenon, experiences, and context. Through this research design, the researcher can ask questions and arrive at solutions to questions that cannot be answered numerically but are key to understanding the human experience.

Zimmerman et al. (2020) used a mixed-method study design to help achieve the study objectives. It was used as in helps increase the generalizability and precision of the study. The main advantage of combining both qualitative and quantitative study designs is that the researchers are capable of gaining a more comprehensive picture which is not possible with a single approach. Therefore, this design was used to collect data from a total of two hundred and twenty-five study participants to help achieve the study objectives.

Description of the Statistical Analysis Associated with the Method and Design of Each Article.

  Data analysis is important in the interpretation of the meaning of the data and in making decisions. Cheng et al. (2018) used SPPS software for data analysis. As part of the analysis, the researchers used percentages, standard deviations, and means to describe satisfaction scores, demographics, and clinical status. T-tests are the major statistical tests used in this study to study the effect of the intervention. Therefore, it was performed between the groups, and between-group variations were noted in the demographics, clinical status, and satisfaction scores. The other statistical tests used in this study include ANOVA and chi-square.

 Gilad et al. (2020) used thematic analysis to analyze their data as directed by their chosen design. The thematic analysis was key in analyzing the responses obtained from the patients and the staff. The responses were mainly on medication use and reports. From the thematic analysis, it was evident that there was a triangular relationship between the patients, physicians, and nurses on medication care and breakdowns in communication and discrepancies. On the other hand, Zimmerman et al. (2020) used percentages and means in analyzing the demographic data. As part of the analysis, they used thematic analysis of the student responses; the researcher noted satisfactory knowledge of IPC among the first and second years.

Discussion of the Reliability and Validity issues Associated with each Methodology and Design

 Reliability and validity is also an important part of research. Therefore, there were various reliability and validity issues connected with each methodology and design. While Cheng et al. (2018) used content validity and Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.93 on reliability, the next article relied on content validity and internal reliability in approving the data collection instruments. Comparatively, Zimmerman et al. (2020) applied content validity and internal reliability to help in approving the data collection instruments.

Summary Comparing the Different Methods and Designs Used In the Studies

  As earlier indicated, it is important for researchers to be well conversant with study design and methodology. The researchers who authored the three articles used different methods and designs to support their samples, dictated by financial resources and answered the research questions. They used different levels of measurements, data analysis strategies, validity, reliability, and population samples which could best help in achieving the study aims. The researchers also collected different kinds of data depending on the research methods and design used as well as the study aims and objectives, with a major focus on answering the research questions.

Conclusion

 A total of three research articles have been analyzed and compared, especially based on the methodology and design. Each article employed a different design to help answer the research questions and achieve the study objectives. The researchers also used different statistical tests and analyses to analyze the collected data and answer the research questions.

References

Cheng, J. F., Huang, X. Y., Lin, M. C., Wang, Y. H., & Yeh, T. P. (2018). A mental health home visit service partnership intervention on improving patients’ satisfaction. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(4), 610-616.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.010

Gilad, L., Haviv, Y. S., Cohen-Glickman, I., Chinitz, D., & Cohen, M. J. (2020). Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches. BMC Nephrology, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01900-y

Singh, M., Thirsk, L., Stahlke, S., Venkatesaperumal, R., LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2021). Nursing research in Canada-E-book: methods, critical appraisal, and utilization. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Zimmerman, P. A. P., Sladdin, I., Shaban, R. Z., Gilbert, J., & Brown, L. (2020). Factors influencing hand hygiene practice of nursing students: A descriptive, mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 44, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102746

Appendix

Comparison Table of Methods and Designs


APA Reference (Include the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.)
Research Methodology and Design Setting/Sample

Setting characteristics

Sampling type (e.g., convenience, purposive, systematic)

Number of participants

 

Instrumentation

·         Identify the instrument

·         Number of questions and how they are answered (e.g., open-ended, multiple choice, Likert scale)

·         Include how the data was collected.

Reliability

Reliability type (e.g., interrater, test-retest, internal)

 

Psychometric data (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha)

 

Validity

Validity type (e.g., construct, content, face)

Psychometric data (e.g., sensitivity, specificity)

Levels of Measurement

(Identify independent and dependent variables and the associated levels of measurements.)

Data Analysis

·         Statistical significance

·         Analysis test used

Cheng, J. F., Huang, X. Y., Lin, M. C., Wang, Y. H., & Yeh, T. P. (2018). A mental health home visit service partnership intervention on improving patients’ satisfaction. Archives of psychiatric nursing, 32(4), 610-616.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.010 Quasi-experimental quantitative design. The research was done in a psychiatric hospital offering home visits. The researcher used purposive sampling to select the study participants. A total of 240 participants were chosen to take part in the study. The scale of Satisfaction with the Mental Health Home Visit Service of the patients was used to measure satisfaction.

The scale has 26 items on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied)

The evaluation consisted of one pre-test (one week before the intervention) and two post-tests (carried out six and 12 months after the intervention.

The study’s findings are trustworthy because the scale used to gather the data is a trustworthy assessment (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.93). Content validity Level of evidence: Ordinal.

Dependent variables: Patients satisfaction

2. Independent variables: community-based and hospital-based home visit

Statistical significance was identified when p < 0.05. T-test, ANOVA, and Chi-square were used
Gilad, L., Haviv, Y. S., Cohen-Glickman, I., Chinitz, D., & Cohen, M. J. (2020). Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches. BMC nephrology, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01900-y  

The study used

qualitative research

design

The research was conducted at Hadassah Medical Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 50 patients, 20 nurses and

eight physicians took part in the study

The researcher used in-depth interviews which integrated closed and open-ended questions.

 

Internal reliability of the findings. Content validity Level of evidence: Nominal.

Dependent variables: patient and staff thoughts and attitudes

Independent variables: medication use

A thematic analysis was used in analyzing the interviews.
Zimmerman, P. A. P., Sladdin, I., Shaban, R. Z., Gilbert, J., & Brown, L. (2020). Factors influencing hand hygiene practice of nursing students: A descriptive, mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 44, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102746 A mixed-method design was used in this research.  

Students enrolling in the first three years of a Bachelor of Nursing program at an Australian institution were included in this research.

A total of 225 students participated in the study.

The study used surveys where participants were asked 11 multiple-choice questions. Internal reliability. Content validity Level of evidence: Nominal.

Independent variables: elements that have an impact on how IPC and HH are practiced.

Dependent variables: IPC and HH theoretical understanding

Thematic analysis was used. Categorical variables were presented as counts (percentages) and continuous variables by medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for nonparametric data. Chi-squared statistics were used to calculate dependence among categorical variables.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assessment Description

The DNP must have a basic knowledge of quantitative methodology and design as it contrasts with qualitative and mixed methods. With this knowledge, the DNP can differentiate between methods and designs used in the evaluation of the evidence. This assignment includes a comparison of methodology and design while examining the external and internal validity of three projects or studies.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

Before beginning this assignment, review the following three articles provided as topic Resources: (1) “A Mental Health Home Visit Service Partnership Intervention on Improving Patients’ Satisfaction”; (2) “Chronic Drug Treatment Among Hemodialysis Patients: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Nursing, and Medical Staff Attitudes and Approaches”; and (3) “Factors Influencing Hand Hygiene Practice of Nursing Students: A Descriptive, Mixed-Methods Study.”

Use the “Comparison Table of Methods and Designs” template located in the DNP-830A folder of the DC Network Practice Immersion workspace to complete the assignment.

Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

Part 1:

Using the “Comparison Table of Methods and Designs,” evaluate the three projects or studies indicated above.

Part 2:

Refer to the information from your “Comparison Table of Methods and Designs” and write a 1,000-1,250-word paper comparing the methods and designs of the three articles. Include the following in your paper:

Description of the characteristics associated with the method of each article.

Description of the characteristics associated with the design of each article.

Description of the statistical analysis associated with the method and design of each article.

Discussion of the reliability and validity issues associated with each methodology and design.

Summary comparing the different methods and designs used in the studies.

Attach the “Comparison Table of Methods and Designs” document as an appendix to your paper.

Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-830A

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock minutes/hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.

Resources

Clinical Analytics and Data Management for the DNP

Read Chapters 1 and 2 in Clinical Analytics and Data Management for the DNP.

View Resource

A Mental Health Home Visit Service Partnership Intervention on Improving Patients’ Satisfaction

Read:

Cheng, J. Huang, X., Lin, M. Wang, Y. & Yeh, P. (2018). A mental health home visit service partnership intervention on im

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S088394171730506X?via%3Dihub

Chronic Drug Treatment Among Hemodialysis Patients: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Nursing, and Medical Staff Attitudes and Approaches

Read:

Gilad, L., Haviv, Y. S., Cohen-Glickman, I., Chinitz, D., & Cohen, M. J. (2020). Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysi

https://www.proquest.com/docview/2424776138?accountid=7374

Factors Influencing Hand Hygiene Practice of Nursing Students: A Descriptive, Mixed-Methods Study

Read:

Zimmerman, P. P., Sladdin, I., Shaban, R. Z., Gilbert, J. & Brown, L. (2020). Factors influencing hand hygiene practice

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1471595318306565?via%3Dihub

Rigor or Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Strategies, Reconceptualization, and Recommendations

Read:

Cypress, B. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualizati

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28570380/

Chapter 2: Variables and Measurement

Read:

Wagner, W. III, & Gillespie, B. (2019). Chapter 2: Variables and measurement. In Using and interpreting statisti

https://methods-sagepub-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/book/using-interpreting-statistics-in-social-behavioral-and-health-sciences/i589.xml?fromsearch=true

Chapter 1: Research Principles

Read:

Knapp, H. (2018). Chapter 1: Research principles. In Intermediate statistics using SPSS (pp. 3-19). SAGE Publication

..

https://methods-sagepub-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/book/intermediate-statistics-using-spss/i991.xml

Data Description in Research

read:

Santucci, A. C. (2021). Data description in research. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=93871877&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Read:

Wienclaw, R. A. (2021). Quantitative and qualitative analysis. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=89185655&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1

An Introduction to Inferential Statistical Tests: Categorical, Ordinal, and Interval Variables

View:

Laurie, C., & Jensen, E. (Academics). (2017). An introduction to inferential statistical tests: Categorical, or

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://methods.sagepub.com/video/an-introduction-to-inferential-statistical-tests

Use Landscape and Portrait Orientation and Use Both in the Same Document

View the following video resources, located on the Microsoft Support website, for assistance in attaching tables or charts in landscape o

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-use-landscape-and-portrait-in-the-same-document-ddd80cb6-c9ae-4493-ba75-c663074031a0

Change Page Orientation to Landscape or Portrait

View the following video and review the associated articles, located on the Microsoft website, for assistance with changing page orientat

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/change-page-orientation-to-landscape-or-portrait-9b5ac1af-9998-4a37-962b-a82b689572a9

DNP Virtual Nurse Residency – Registration

Enrollment and successful completion of the DNP Virtual Nurse Residency (VNR) is required for learners to be eligible to enroll for DNP-9

DNP Virtual Nurse Residency – Attestation if Not Registering

Complete the “DNP-830A Residency Completion Attestation” for each required exempt assignment if you are not registering

DNP-830A-RS1-Residency C

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Medicine
This was done very well. Thank you!
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Well researched paper. Excellent work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE ADVOCATE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM
The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!
Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022
Medicine
Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time
Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat