Community Teaching Assignment Rubric
Community Teaching Assignment Rubric
Permalink:
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Community Teaching Assignment Rubric
Just from $13/Page
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% | 2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00% | 3 Satisfactory 83.00% | 4 Good 94.00% | 5 Excellent 100.00% | ||
| 80.0 %Content | ||||||
| 30.0 %Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Rationale for Topic | Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or missing. | Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete. | Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague. | Focus of community teaching is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Rationale is not provided. | Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale. | |
| 50.0 % Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described | Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete. Community Teaching Assignment Rubric | Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion of community response to teaching is missing. | Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief discussion of community response to teaching. | A detailed evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided. | Comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response provided along with a detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers is provided. | |
| 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
| 5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
| 5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. Community Teaching Assignment Rubric | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. | |
| 5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Community Teaching Assignment Rubric | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 5.0 %Format | ||||||
| 2.0 % Paper Format | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
| 3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. | |
| 100 % Total Weightage | Community Teaching Assignment Rubric |
