ASSIGNMENT: DNP-835 Sustainability Worksheet

ASSIGNMENT: DNP-835 Sustainability Worksheet

ASSIGNMENT: DNP-835 Sustainability Worksheet

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to identify the elements needed to create a long-term plan to sustain the improvement outcomes for your proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program selected for your Quality and Sustainability paper.

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE  

You will use this worksheet to develop your Sustainability Plan Presentation in Topic 7.

General Guidelines:

Use the attached “Sustainability Plan Worksheet” to complete this assignment.
Scholarly or peer-reviewed research articles are required for support. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:

Use the “Sustainability Plan Worksheet” to complete this assignment. Follow the instructions on the worksheet as indicated.

Attachments

DNP-835A-RS5-Sustainability Worksheet.docx

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Rubric Criteria
Total

100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Measurement After Project Completion

Elements measured or not measured; actions if a negative effect is observed; actions if clinical significance but not statistical significance are observed.

0 points

Measurement considerations for the sustainability plan are omitted or are not relevant for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

13.6 points

Measurement considerations for the sustainability plan are incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

14.96 points

Measurement considerations for the sustainability plan are outlined and generally address elements measured or not measured, actions in the event a negative effect is observed, and actions if clinical significance is observed but statistical significance is not. Some aspects of the plan need more information or support to fully support the sustainability plan for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

15.64 points

Measurement considerations for the sustainability plan are adequately presented and include elements measured or not measured, actions in the event a negative effect is observed, and actions if clinical significance is observed but statistical significance is not. The plan for measurement supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17 points

Measurement considerations for the sustainability plan are specific and clear and include elements measured or not measured, actions in the event a negative effect is observed, and actions if clinical significance is observed but statistical significance is not. The detailed plan for measurement is concise and supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

Workload

Impact of change on workload to system; ways to decrease workload, if needed; if workload not decreasing, how communication occurs to indicate what is and is not changing.

0 points

Workload considerations for the sustainability plan are omitted.

13.6 points

Workload considerations for the sustainability plan are incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

14.96 points

Workload considerations for the sustainability plan generally outline whether the change increases the overall workload to the system, ways to decrease the workload, if needed, and how what is changing and what is not changing will be communicated. Some aspects of the plan need more information or support to fully support the sustainability plan for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

15.64 points

Workload considerations for the sustainability plan are adequately presented and include information on whether the change increases the overall workload to the system, ways to decrease the workload, if needed, and how what is changing and what is not changing will be communicated. The plan for change management supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17 points

Workload considerations for the sustainability plan are specific and clear and include information on whether the change increases the overall workload to the system, ways to decrease the workload, if needed, and how what is changing and what is not changing will be communicated. The detailed plan for workload is well-developed and supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Research

Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Research

0 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research is omitted.

4 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research is lacking; the sources provided do not provide support.

4.4 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides general support. Most sources are published within the last 5 years and generally appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.

4.6 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides adequate support. Sources are published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.

5 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides excellent support. Sources are published within the last 5 years and highly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.

Change Management

Responding to resistance/barriers to change; how selected evidence-based change model ensures adoption and sustainability of program; standardization of process so it is easy to do the right new thing.

0 points

Change management considerations for the sustainability plan are omitted.

13.6 points

Change management considerations for the sustainability plan are incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

14.96 points

Change management considerations for the sustainability plan generally outline ways to respond to resistance/barriers to change, how the selected evidence-based change model ensures adoption and sustainability of program, and how standardization of process will occur so it is easy to do the right new thing. Some aspects of the plan need more information or support to fully support the sustainability plan for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

15.64 points

Change management considerations for the sustainability plan are adequately presented and include ways to respond to resistance/barriers to change, how the selected evidence-based change model ensures adoption and sustainability of program, and how standardization of process will occur so it is easy to do the right new thing. The plan for change management supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17 points

Change management considerations for the sustainability plan are specific and clear and include ways to respond to resistance/barriers to change, how the selected evidence-based change model ensures adoption and sustainability of program, and how standardization of process will occur so it is easy to do the right new thing. The detailed plan for change management is well-developed and supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

Documentation of Sources

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style

0 points

Sources are not documented.

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

Communication

How change will be communicated and identification of messenger; when communication occurs; how individuals will be supported in new process; type of training needed and person responsible for training.

0 points

Communication considerations for the sustainability plan are omitted.

13.6 points

Communication considerations for the sustainability plan are incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

14.96 points

Communication considerations for the sustainability plan generally outline how change will be communicated, by who and when, and ideas for supporting and training individuals. Some aspects of the plan need more information or support to fully support the sustainability plan for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

15.64 points

Communication considerations for the sustainability plan are adequately presented and include how change will be communicated and who will communicate change, when communication occurs, how individuals will be supported in new process, and the type of training needed and person responsible for training. The plan for communication supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17 points

Communication considerations for the sustainability plan are specific and clear and include how change will be communicated and who will communicate change, when communication occurs, how individuals will be supported in new process, and the type of training needed and person responsible for training. The detailed plan for communication is well-developed and supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied.

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Ownership

Owner of new process implemented; indications if owner is engaged and on board with improvement process.

0 points

Ownership considerations for the sustainability plan are omitted.

13.6 points

Ownership considerations for the sustainability plan for are incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

14.96 points

Ownership considerations for the sustainability plan identify the owner of the new process and outline general indicators to determine if the owner is involved and on board with the improvement process. Some aspects of the plan need more information or support to fully support the sustainability plan for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design.

15.64 points

Ownership considerations for the sustainability plan are adequately presented and identify the owner of the new process and outline indicators to determine if the owner is involved and on board with the improvement process. The plan for ownership adequately supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality and/or safety program design. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17 points

Ownership considerations for the sustainability plan are specific and clear and identify the owner of the new process and outline indicators to determine if the owner is involved and on board with the improvement process. The detailed plan for ownership is well-developed and supports sustainability for the proposed evidence-based quality or safety program design.