| |
1
Unsatisfactory
59.00% |
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00% |
3
Satisfactory
75.00% |
4
Good
85.00% |
5
Excellent
100.00% |
| 70.0 %Content |
|
| 35.0 %Current And Significant Dates Added To Timeline from 1988 Onward |
Not included. |
Current and significant dates are incorporated into the timeline from 1988 onward, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. |
Current and significant dates are incorporated into the timeline from 1988 onward, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. |
Current and significant dates are incorporated into the timeline from 1988 onward in full. The submission provides appropriate support. |
Current and significant dates are incorporated into the timeline from 1988 onward comprehensively. Level of detail is appropriate. |
|
| 35.0 %Description For Each Significant Date And Event Added To The Timeline |
Not included. |
A description for each significant date and event added to the timeline is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. |
A description for each significant date and event added to the timeline is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. |
A description for each significant date and event added to the timeline is present in full. The submission provides appropriate support. |
A description for each significant date and event added to the timeline is present comprehensively. Level of detail is appropriate. |
|
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Timeline for the History of Public Health and Epidemiology Essay Rubric
Just from $13/Page
ORDER OUR SERVICES HERE
|
| 7.0 %Theme Development and Purpose |
Submission lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Submission is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
Theme of the submission is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Theme of the submission is clear, descriptive and appropriate to the purpose. |
Submission is comprehensive and the purpose and all elements are clear and thorough. |
|
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
| 10.0 %Format |
|
| 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
| 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
| 100 %Total Weightage |
|
|
