NRS 430-Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitude and Hesitancy of Nurses in Nassau, The Bahamas toward the COVID-19 vaccines.

(5 points)

Adheres to requirements, cover page, margins, line spacing, font, pagination, paragraphing, appendices, illustrations, graphs/charts, tables, labelling and numbering

(4-3 points)

Adheres to most requirements

(2-1 point)

Adheres to few requirements

(< 1 point)

Does not adhere to requirements

(10-8 points)

Concise summary, background, significance of the research/study, objectives, methodology, major findings, and conclusions, all key words within word limit.

(7-6 points)

Generally well-written summary except for shortcomings in one or two areas

(5-4 points)

Vague/imprecise summary, some findings and key words omitted, insufficient attention to word limit

(< 1 point)

Very inadequate/imprecise summary, no key words, text beyond the word limit

(10-8 points)

Introduction: Clearly defines scope of study, shows significance of research, provides clear justification for the study.

Objectives: Clearly stated, relate to the hypothesis/problem statement, appropriately placed after the introduction.

(7-6 points)

Introduction: Defines scope of study, shows significance of research, provides limited justification for the study.

Objectives: Well-stated and shows some relationship to the hypothesis/problem statement, appropriately placed after the introduction.

(5-4 points)

Introduction: Some material not relevant/unconvincing in showing the significance of the work, background material sketchy.

Objectives: Some indication of the objectives given but unconvincing as to the relationship with the hypothesis/problem statement.

(< 4 points)

Introduction: Much of the material irrelevant, significance of the research/study not shown, vague description of background eg. No connection of literature to research.

Objectives: Not clearly stated .

(10-8 points)

Relevant and current, logical development of supporting argument, wide range of sources, relevant, appropriately cited quotes

(7-6 points)

Generally clear and easy to follow, repeatable where appropriate, describes equipment and materials where necessary

(5-4 points)

Relevant material but not effectively organized to support argument, many references omitted, some theory included but application not clearly specified.

(< 4 points)

Much of the literature irrelevant, material insufficient to support argument, verbose but shows little evidence of critical analysis, relevant theory but not included/developed

(10-8 points)

Accurate, clear, easy to follow, repeatable where appropriate, describes equipment and materials where relevant

(7-6 points)

Generally clear and easy to follow, repeatable where appropriate, describes equipment and materials where relevant

(5-4 points)

Unclear in key areas/some steps are missing making it difficult to repeat the procedure/follow process

(< 4 points)

Imprecisely/inaccurately written, difficult to follow or repeat, no/inadequate description of equipment and materials/processes.

(5 points)

Accurate and consistent use of recommended style guide, appropriate and complete in-text citations, complete compilation of literature cited/referenced/bibliography

 (4-3 points)

Very minor inaccuracies/inconsistencies in use of style guide, few in-text citations omitted, almost complete compilation of literature cited/referenced/bibliography

(2 points)

Some inaccuracies/inconsistencies in use of style guide, few in-text citations omitted, some omissions of literature cited/referenced/bibliography

(< 2 points)

Major inaccuracies/ inconsistencies in use of style guide ignored, unconventional in-text citations omitted, numerous omissions of literature cited/referenced/bibliography

(5 points)

Paragraph structure, correct use of terms/diction, grammar, spelling, punctuation, sentence variety.

(4 points)

Errors in one area only

(3-2 points)

Error in two/three areas only.

(< 2 points)

Errors in more than three areas

(5 points)

Unity, coherence, emphasis, completeness, clarity

(4 points)

Shortcomings in one area only

 (3-2 points)

Shortcomings in two/three areas only

(< 2 points)

Shortcomings in more than three areas.