DNP 840 Patient Care Delivery Assignment
DNP 840 Patient Care Delivery Assignment
DNP 840 Patient Care Delivery Assignment
Assessment Description
There will be times when the doctorally prepared advanced practice nurse will need to suggest a change in patient care delivery. It will be important for the doctorally prepared advanced practice nurse to understand how to deliver information and what information should be shared with an audience.
This assignment will give you practice with presentation software along with preparing you to provide specific information for your proposed changes. This is a two-part assignment that will also give you practice in presenting to administrators.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic and at least one in-text citation from each source.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
Part 1:
Create a 12-15 slide presentation (PowerPoint or voice-over; Prezi, include voice-over) that presents a proposed change in patient care delivery related to your DPI Project. The presentation must demonstrate considerations for finance, quality, patient safety, and patient experience.
If you are completing a PowerPoint presentation: The speaker notes must contain a detailed script of your presentation, as if you were verbally presenting. The speaker notes must include embedded citations supporting your presentation.
If you are completing a Prezi: Citations supporting your presentation need to be embedded.
Include the following:
Background of issue
SWOT analysis
The proposed solution
How the solution meets the need of the population (stakeholders, cost, and payer to proposed change)
Proposed change process
Expected outcomes
Implications that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing
Part 2:
Present your presentation to at least one administrator. Inform the administrator on the purpose of the assignment and that you will be seeking feedback on content and delivery. This is an opportunity to practice presenting to the executive team.
Write a brief summary (100-250 words) of the feedback given to you by the administrator(s).
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-840A
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock minutes/hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Patient Care Delivery – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total90 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discussion of the Background of the Issue
Discussion of the Background of the Issue |
0 points
The background of the chosen issue is not present. |
5.76 points
The background of the chosen issue is present but incomplete. |
6.34 points
The background of the chosen issue is present but rendered at an inadequate level. |
6.62 points
The background of the chosen issue is present. Discussion is detailed and defines specific elements. |
7.2 points
The background of the chosen issue is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis |
0 points
A SWOT analysis is not present. |
7.2 points
A SWOT analysis is present but incomplete. |
7.92 points
A SWOT analysis is present but rendered at an inadequate level. |
8.28 points
A SWOT analysis is detailed. |
9 points
A SWOT analysis is thorough. |
Proposed Solution
Proposed Solution |
0 points
A proposed solution is not present. |
5.76 points
A proposed solution is present but incomplete. |
6.34 points
A proposed solution is present but rendered at an inadequate level. |
6.62 points
A proposed solution and specific elements are detailed. |
7.2 points
A proposed solution is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Suggested Ways That the Proposed Solution Meets the Needs of the Population
Suggested Ways That the Proposed Solution Meets the Needs of the Population |
0 points
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population, including stakeholders, cost, and payer to proposed change, are not present. |
5.76 points
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population, including stakeholders, cost, and payer to proposed change, are present but incomplete. |
6.34 points
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population, including stakeholders, cost, and payer to proposed change, are present but rendered at an inadequate level. |
6.62 points
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population, including stakeholders, cost, payer to proposed change, and specific elements, are detailed. |
7.2 points
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population, including stakeholders, cost, and payer to proposed change, are clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Proposed Change Process for Patient Care Delivery
Proposed Change Process for Patient Care Delivery |
0 points
A proposed change process for patient care delivery is not present. |
5.76 points
A proposed change process for patient care delivery is incomplete. |
6.34 points
A proposed change process for patient care delivery is present but rendered at an inadequate level. |
6.62 points
A proposed change process for patient care delivery and specific elements are detailed. |
7.2 points
A proposed change process for patient care delivery is thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Expected Outcomes
Expected Outcomes |
0 points
The expected outcomes are not present. |
7.2 points
The expected outcomes are present but incomplete. |
7.92 points
The expected outcomes are present but rendered at an inadequate level. |
8.28 points
The expected outcomes and specific elements are detailed. |
9 points
The expected outcomes are clearly presented. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Implications of the Proposed Solutions Are Realistic and Aligned With Health Care Planning
Implications of the Proposed Solutions That Are Realistic and Aligned With Current and Future Health Care Financing |
0 points
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is not present. |
5.76 points
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is incomplete. |
6.34 points
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is rendered at an inadequate level. |
6.62 points
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is clearly presented and detailed. |
7.2 points
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Presentation Feedback
Presentation Feedback |
0 points
A brief summary of presentation feedback is not present. |
7.2 points
A brief summary of presentation feedback is present, but lacks detail. |
7.92 points
A brief summary of presentation feedback is present. |
8.28 points
A brief summary of presentation feedback is detailed. |
9 points
A brief summary of presentation feedback is thorough. |
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience |
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. |
5.04 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. |
5.54 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. |
5.8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. |
6.3 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience. |
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. |
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. |
5.76 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. |
6.34 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
6.62 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
7.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. |
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. |
3.6 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. |
3.96 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. |
4.14 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. |
4.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., |
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. |
7.2 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. |
7.92 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. |
8.28 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. |
9 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated. |