Assignment: NRNP 6665 Prescribing for Children and Adolescents

Assignment: NRNP 6665 Prescribing for Children and Adolescents

sychotropic drugs are commonly used for children and adolescents to treat mental health disorders, yet many of these drugs are not FDA approved for use in these populations. Thus, their use is considered “off-label,” and it is often up to the best judgment of the prescribing clinician. As a PMHNP, you will need to apply the best available information and research on pharmacological treatments for children in order to safely and effectively treat child and adolescent patients. Sometimes this will come in the form of formal studies and approvals for drugs in children. Other times you may need to extrapolate from research or treatment guidelines on drugs in adults. Each individual patient case will need to be considered independently and each treatment considered from a risk assessment standpoint. What psychotherapeutic approach might be indicated as an initial treatment? What are the potential side effects of a particular drug?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NRNP 6665 Prescribing for Children and Adolescents

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. We have attached a well-researched, instruction-compliant sample at the end of the instructions. If you are satisfied with the sample, you can request us to customize your assignment. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper. Kindly scroll down to review the sample.

For this Assignment, you consider these questions and others as you explore FDA-approved (“on label”) pharmacological treatments, non-FDA-approved (“off-label”) pharmacological treatments, and nonpharmacological treatments for disorders in children and adolescents.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment: NRNP 6665 Prescribing for Children and Adolescents
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Reference:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015). Off-label drugs: What you need to know. https://www.ahrq.gov/patients-consumers/patient-involvement/off-label-drug-usage.htmlLinks to an external site.

RESOURCES

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCE

TO PREPARE

  • Your Instructor will assign a specific disorder for you to research for this Assignment.
  • Use the Walden library to research evidence-based treatments for your assigned disorder in children and adolescents. You will need to recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating this disorder in children and adolescents.

THE ASSIGNMENT (1–2 PAGES)

  • Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
  • Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?
  • Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.
  • Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3

Submit your Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 1–2 pages, address the following: • Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

The response accurately and concisely explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

22 to >19.0 ptsGood

The response accurately explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

19 to >17.0 ptsFair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

17 to >0 ptsPoor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains interventions that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents. Interventions may not represent the three types of interventions required, or response may be missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

The response accurately and concisely explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. A concise and accurate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided.

22 to >19.0 ptsGood

The response accurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. An adequate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided.

19 to >17.0 ptsFair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is somewhat vague or inaccurate.

17 to >0 ptsPoor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is vague or inaccurate. Or, the response is missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

The response accurately and concisely uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.

22 to >19.0 ptsGood

The response accurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.

19 to >17.0 ptsFair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.

17 to >0 ptsPoor

The response vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations. Or, the response is missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). Attach the PDFs of your sources.
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Two or fewer resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations. The resources may not be current or evidence based.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGood

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 ptsGood

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 ptsGood

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts
Total Points: 100

NRNP 6665 Prescribing for Children and Adolescents Sample Essay

            Depression may start early in life. Frequent psychotherapy is the only choice for treating moderate depression in adolescents and children. According to Hetrick et al. (2021), in cases where depression symptoms fail to improve or worsen after a period of up to eight weeks, a prescription for an antidepressant medication may be recommended. Adolescents and teenagers experiencing moderate to profound depression typically require a combination of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Combination treatment may improve a person’s coping skills, sense of self, the probability that their symptoms will go away, and connections with loved ones. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the treatment of major depressive disorders in children and adolescents.

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NRNP 6665 Prescribing for Children and Adolescents

FDA-Approved Drug

According to Selph and McDonagh (2019), the FDA has approved the utilization of fluoxetine as the primary treatment option for younger patients diagnosed with depression. The pharmaceutical agent in question is classified as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), a medication type that carries a heightened potential for inducing suicidal ideation, necessitating vigilant supervision. When given in small doses, the medicine has shown promise in easing the symptoms of depression in youngsters after 6 to 8 weeks of treatment. Because of its improved safety, tolerability, and decreased risk of side effects, fluoxetine is supported by the clinical guidelines of both the American Psychological Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics for the treatment of pediatric depression (Araz Altay et al., 2019).

Off-Label Drug

Sertraline and other SSRIs are routinely used off-label to treat pediatric depression due to their good safety profiles. According to Potter et al. (2019), the medication has been granted approval by the FDA for the management of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in children aged six years and above. Disorientation, hallucinations, and agitation have all been connected to the drug’s intoxicating quantities. However, when administered in modest doses and progressively increased by treatment results, the medication has shown notable efficacy in decreasing depressive symptoms in children when compared to other psychotropic medicines. The high effectiveness, tolerability, and safety profile of this intervention in the susceptible population has led to its widespread endorsement in various national clinical guidelines, such as those issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), for the management of pediatric depression.

Nonpharmacological Intervention

Depression in children may also be treated non-pharmacologically using techniques like cognitive behavioral therapy and other forms of psychotherapy. According to research, CBT is a powerful treatment for mild depression that may be used alone to cure the condition (Liu et al., 2021). Contrarily, when a child’s depression is severe, adopting CBT in conjunction with medication hastens the resolution of the depressive symptoms. Children can acquire resilient coping mechanisms that can improve their overall well-being. Most clinical guidelines, such as the NICE guideline, advocate for psychotherapeutic intervention as the primary treatment option for children diagnosed with depression due to the advantageous effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) implementation.

Conclusion

Despite the significant increase in the utilization of antidepressants among children and adolescents, there exists limited empirical support for the superiority of their benefits over the associated risks. Moreover, the emergence of suicidal tendencies during treatment continues to be a significant apprehension. Undoubtedly, there exists a necessity for safer and more efficacious treatments, encompassing both medical and psychological interventions, given the significant concerns surrounding overuse and prescriptions that deviate from the recommended guidelines. This discourse is anticipated to stimulate novel research and engender intellectually stimulating discourse.

References

‌Araz Altay, M., Bozatlı, L., Demirci Şipka, B., & Görker, I. (2019). Current Pattern of Psychiatric Comorbidity and Psychotropic Drug Prescription in Child and Adolescent Patients. Medicina55(5), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050159

Hetrick, S. E., McKenzie, J. E., Bailey, A. P., Sharma, V., Moller, C. I., Badcock, P. B., Cox, G. R., Merry, S. N., & Meader, N. (2021). New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2021(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013674.pub2

Liu, W., Li, G., Wang, C., Wang, X., & Yang, L. (2021). Efficacy of Sertraline Combined with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescent Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine2021, 5309588. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5309588

Potter, L. A., Scholze, D. A., Biag, H. M. B., Schneider, A., Chen, Y., Nguyen, D. V., Rajaratnam, A., Rivera, S. M., Dwyer, P. S., Tassone, F., Al Olaby, R. R., Choudhary, N. S., Salcedo-Arellano, M. J., & Hagerman, R. J. (2019). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sertraline in Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00810

Selph, S. S., & McDonagh, M. S. (2019). Depression in Children and Adolescents: Evaluation and Treatment. American Family Physician100(10), 609–617. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2019/1115/p609.html

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE ADVOCATE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM
The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!
Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022
Medicine
This was done very well. Thank you!
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Well researched paper. Excellent work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time
Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat