HLT 362 Article Analysis 2 Assignment Essay
HLT 362 Article Analysis 2 Assignment Essay
HLT 362 Article Analysis 2 Assignment Essay
Article Analysis Part 2
Research interpretation is important in healthcare for nurse and other providers to make better and evidence-based decisions. An analysis of research articles and evidence presented enables providers to recognize risk factors, trends, and treatment aspects as well as best practices. The purpose of this paper is to analyze two quantitative research articles that enhances better interpretation of the various components of evidence and its use in health care environments.
ORDER A CUSTOM PAPER NOW
Article Citation
and Permalink
Noor, N., Rehman, S., Ahmed, Y., Sarmad, M., & Mehmood, R. (2023). Discriminatory practices and poor job performance: A study of person-related hostility among nursing staff. Heliyon, 9(3).
Link: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2023.e14351
(Include permalink for articles from GCU Library.)
Honkavuo, L. (2020). Digital Teaching in Nursing Education: A Quantitative Study on Nursing Students’ Views. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 13(2), 837-846.
Link:http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/8_1_honkauvo_original_13_2.pdf
Point Description Description
Broad Topic Area/Title Discriminatory practices and poor job performance: A study of person-related hostility among nursing staff Digital Teaching in Nursing Education: A Quantitative Study on Nursing Students’ Views
Define Hypotheses H0: Discriminatory practices are an aspect of nursing staff hostility that lead to poor job performance
H1: Lack of administrative support and gender discrimination lead to person-associated hostility that impact nurses’ job performance
H2: Gender discrimination has a positive relationship with person-related hostility H0: Nursing education impacts digitalization of teaching and students’ view on digital learning
H1: Digitalization an essential component of effective learning in nursing
Define Variables and Types of Data for Variables Independent Variables:
Gender discrimination
Administrative support
Dependent variable:
Job performance
Type of Data Variables
Ordinal: Personal hostility and performance
Nominal: Poor Performance Independent Variables:
Digitalization of learning
Students’ knowledge and motivation
Dependent variable:
Nursing education
Type of Data Variables
Ordinal: teaching learning
Knowledge on digital learning
Population of Interest for the Study The population of interest in the study is nurses and health care organizations; especially those facilities that experience discrimination and poor job performance. The population of interest in the study include nursing students as well as nurse educators who provide instructions to students.
Sample 569 186 informants
Sampling Method Convenient sampling involving participants from various departments in the facility The sampling method was strategic cluster choice based on greater socio-educational-political view
How Were Data Collected? The article collected data using questionnaires and surveys. Electronic web questionnaire allowed for the complete collection of effective data for the study.
Conclusion
Research analysis is important in improving a provider’s appreciation of evidence in different circumstances for better deployment in nursing practice. The interpretation of research helps providers to gain and use better approaches to patient issues based on their concerns and needs. Patient care requires better application of best practices emanating from research evidence as demonstrated in different articles on a subject of interest.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Search the GCU Library and find two new health care articles that use quantitative research. Do not use articles from a previous assignment, or articles that appear in the topic Resources or textbook.
Complete an article analysis for each using the “Article Analysis: Part 2” template.
Refer to the “Patient Preference and Satisfaction in Hospital-at-Home and Usual Hospital Care for COPD Exacerbations: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial,” in conjunction with the “Article Analysis Example 2,” for an example of an article analysis.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Article Analysis 2 – Rubric
Collapse All
Two Quantitative Articles 13 points
Criteria Description
Two Quantitative Articles
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
N/A
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one articles are based on quantitative research
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points N/A
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Fewer than two articles are presented. None of the articles presented use
Article Citation and Permalink 13 points
Criteria Description
Article Citation and Permalink
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is accurately presented in APA format. Page numbers are accurate and used in all areas when citing information.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format. Page numbers are used in to cite information. There are minor errors.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format, but there are errors. Page numbers to cite information are missing, or incorrect, in some areas.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. There are significant errors. Page numbers are not indicated to cite information, or the page numbers are incorrect.
Broad Topic Area/Title 13 points
Criteria Description Broad Topic Area/Title
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Broad topic area and title are fully presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Broad topic area and title are presented. There are some minor errors, but the content overall is accurate.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Broad topic area and title are summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points Broad topic area and title are referenced but are incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Broad topic area and title are omitted.
Hypothesis 13 points
Criteria Description Hypothesis
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Hypothesis is accurate and clearly defined.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Hypothesis is defined. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points Hypothesis is summarized. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Independent and Dependent Variable Type and Data for Variable 13 points
Criteria Description
Independent and Dependent Variable Type and Data for Variable
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Population of Interest for the Study 13 points
Criteria Description
Population of Interest for the Study
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Population of interest for the study is presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
Sample 13 points
Criteria Description Sample
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Sample is presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Sample is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Sample is presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points Sample is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Sampling Method 13 points
Criteria Description Sampling Method
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
Sampling method is presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Sampling is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Sampling is presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points Sampling is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Sampling method is omitted.
How Was Data Collected 13 points
Criteria Description How Was Data Collected
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
The means of data collection are presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
The means of data collection are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
The means of data collection are presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points
The means of data collection are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
Mechanics of Writing 13 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
5. 5: Excellent 13 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good 11.05 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory 9.75 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.45 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Total 130 points
