ANALYZING GROUP TECHNIQUES ESSAY

ANALYZING GROUP TECHNIQUES ESSAY

ANALYZING GROUP TECHNIQUES ESSAY

Analyzing Group Techniques
Individual, group, and family therapies help manage mental health illnesses. Mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, and substance use disorders can benefit significantly from individual, group, and family therapies. Group leaders should be equipped with knowledge and skills to ensure the selected therapy is effective, leverages all advantages, and minimizes disadvantages. This essay analyzes group therapy session techniques for substance use disorders and proposes strategies to improve group therapy sessions.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
ANALYZING GROUP TECHNIQUES ESSAY
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

ORDER A CUSTOM PAPER NOW

Group Therapy Techniques Demonstrated

Various group therapy techniques were employed in this group therapy session. Catharsis is a critical therapeutic principle in this group where the group leader encouraged the members to share their feelings and experiences to help relieve negative emotions such as pain and stress. It is accompanied by empathetic listening for effectiveness in managing these emotions. One of the group therapy techniques used was sharing activities where group members asked one another questions. These questions help members express their feelings and deal with negative emotions. “Sharing” encourages individuals to discuss with one another and share their thoughts and personal experiences (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005). Huang et al. (2021) show that group sharing helps participants feel that they are not alone and that others empathize with their experiences.
This method was the primary technique utilized, and it was greatly utilized. The members contributed to the patient’s situation and exposed their shameful life activities. Another technique used was active listening. The group members listened actively to Jimmy, allowed him to express his thoughts, and only contributed when he was done expressing himself. Rosen et al. (2020) note that active listening is integral to developing resilience among healthcare workers. Active listening allows the speaker to feel valued and also allows them to express their feelings fully. These strategies helped the group succeed and were fully demonstrated in this group therapy session.
What the Therapist Did Well
The therapists asked objective questions and encouraged the members to speak while avoiding coercion. The group therapists also stressed the questions to ensure the client understood the question and that their answers were objective. She also allowed the members to contribute to the problem in question. Contributing in groups is helpful both to the individual and the recipient of the information. It also helps create a sense of belonging and increases trust among group members.
I would have made ground rules on issues such as coordinated communication during the session. Cruwys et al. (2020) note that making ground rules has been cited as significant in ensuring coordinated activity. I would have ensured that people contributed to the information in an orderly manner, such as a request to contribute on contributing in a circle. The intervention would help the group to be orderly and eliminate missed opportunities. The intervention would also help ensure everybody contributes to the group hence inclusiveness. It was evident that some individuals did not participate in the group therapy session during this session.
Some insights gained from watching the therapists lead the group are that encouragement without coercion in group therapy is significant. Individuals should be encouraged to speak but should never be pushed to share information. They should also understand that it is okay if it is difficult to share information. Group sessions should also be objective because discussions can take any direction and fail to achieve therapeutic outcomes when not goal-directed (Novotney, 2019). The group therapists should also be experienced and well-educated to help control the group in the desired direction.
Handling Difficult group Members
When leading a group, it is essential to have a formation or a framework before beginning. Novotney (2019) notes that it is vital to understand what one wants to do, how, and why. In addition, the very existence of rules forces participants to follow and implement them (Novotney, 2019). Agreeing on group rules, such as “group members should not be disruptive,” can help manage the client. In addition, addressing the client directly is significant. Sometimes, calling them for a one-to-one meeting when the behavior persists is significant to help streamline the behavior. Having a plan also helps the group leader evaluate the group therapy session of success. Another intervention to help handle this member is to give every member a chance to share (Novotney, 2019). The intervention helps reduce disruption because the individuals will still have a chance to share their information. By managing the disruptive members, I expect that individuals understand the objectives and rules and follow them for a practical session. The transition stage will also be smooth, with patients able to express emotions without fear of disruption or disruption. Minimized disruptions and a practical working stage would also help achieve the session’s goals and objectives, hence better patient outcomes. In the working stage, an anticipated change is more openness in sharing deep emotions and trust creation in the group. Another expectation is positive feedback at the final stage of the group.
In group therapy, some group members may be inactive and fail to participate at all times. That happens when group members are allowed free communication, where an individual participates where they feel comfortable or have information to share. To elicit participation, I would adopt a structure that allows all group members to contribute. Examples include contributions based on first name alphabetical order or according to the arrangement in the room. Such strategies ensure that all individuals participate in the session. However, no individual should be coerced to participate. All individuals will be offered an equal chance to contribute. Another strategy is to encourage members to speak by encouraging rather than scolding their answers (Novotney, 2019). There should be no right or wrong answer in the group therapy session. All answers from group members should be empathetically collected to prevent the members from shying away from participating.
Group therapy leverages social support and helps patients feel they are not alone in the problem. Maholtra and Bakler (2022) note that group therapy helps create a sense of belonging. They also facilitate members to offer and receive support from others, all of which help move towards better management of mental health issues. It also helps communicate with others and relate with them in healthier ways. Social relations are significant to the recuperation of mental health issues. However, group therapy also has challenges. Personality conflicts and conflicts of ideas can result in group therapy. Individuals are different, and conflicts are bound to happen, which are difficult to control and can affect group therapy’s effectiveness (Maholtra & Bakler, 2022). Maholtra and Bakler (2022) also note that patient confidentiality is an issue in group therapy, and they are prone to violations of patient information safety. They can also be uncomfortable when sharing shameful experiences, and much trust is required, and they must thus take time to be effective. In addition, not every candidate is good for group therapy, and a lack of keen assessment priority leads to poor outcomes. Developing ways to manage these interventions is crucial to success in group therapy.
Conclusion
Active listening and sharing activities are important techniques in group therapy. They help group members feel valued and part of the team. They also help ensure members share emotions and they can deal with emotions of pain or stress. Group therapy leaders should be aware of the strategies they can use to improve group therapy participation and ensure everyone learns. Group therapy is an effective intervention but can be ineffective if not properly led.

References
Cats Cats. (2016, September 29). Interpersonal group therapy for addiction recovery demonstrationLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/szS31h0kMI0
Cruwys, T., Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Hornsey, M. J., McGarty, C., & Skorich, D. P. (2020). Predictors of social identification in group therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 30(3), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1587193
Huang, C. Y., Su, H., Cheng, S. M., & Tan, C. S. (2021). The effects of group art therapy on adolescents’ self‐concept and peer relationship: A mixed‐method study. New Directions For Child And Adolescent Development, 2021(179), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20435
Jecker, N. S., & Atuire, C. A. (2022). Global sharing of COVID‐19 therapies during a “New Normal.” Bioethics, 36(6), 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13028
Malhotra, A., & Baker, J. (2022). Group Therapy. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Novotney, A. (2019). Keys to Great Group Therapy. American Psychological Association. Retrieved March 14, 2023, from https://www.apa.org/monitor/2019/04/group-therapy
Rosen, B., Preisman, M., Hunter, J., & Maunder, R. (2020). Applying psychotherapeutic principles to bolster resilience among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. (4), 144-148. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20200020
Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). Interpersonal learning. In The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.) (pp. 19–52). Basic Books.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

ANALYZING GROUP TECHNIQUES

Group therapy can alleviate feelings of isolation and foster a supportive and collaborative environment for sharing difficult feelings in order to facilitate healing. For many people, being part of a group that has a shared understanding of a struggle provides a unique opportunity to gain understanding of their own experiences.
As you examine one of the group therapy demonstrations from this week’s Learning Resources, consider the role and efficacy of the leader and the reasons that specific therapeutic techniques were selected.

THE ASSIGNMENT
In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:
• What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
• What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
• What did you notice that the therapist did well?
• Explain something that you would have handled differently.
• What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?
• Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?
• Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

Required Media
• Cats Cats. (2016, September 29). Interpersonal group therapy for addiction recovery demonstrationLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/szS31h0kMI0

LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
• American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disordersLinks to an external site. (5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
o “Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis”
• Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
o Chapter 12, “Group Therapy”
• Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The therapeutic factors. In The theory and practice of group psychotherapy Download The theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.) (pp. 1–18). Basic Books.
Credit: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. Copyright 2005 by Basic Books. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books via the Copyright Clearance Center.
• Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). Interpersonal learning. In The theory and practice of group psychotherapy Download The theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.) (pp. 19–52). Basic Books.
Credit: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. Copyright 2005 by Basic Books. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books via the Copyright Clearance Center.
• Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). Group cohesiveness. In The theory and practice of group psychotherapy Download The theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.) (pp. 53–76). Basic Books.
Credit: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. Copyright 2005 by Basic Books. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books via the Copyright Clearance Center.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

 

Criteria Ratings Pts
Develop a 3- to 4- page paper

considering the role and efficacy of the

leader of a group therapy demonstration. Be sure to address the following: ·

Describe the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated and evaluate how well they were demonstrated. .

Include evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–

100%

The response accurately and thoroughly describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video….. The

response includes accurate, clear, and detailed

evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video….. The

response includes evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response includes a

somewhat vague or inaccurate description and evaluation of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video….. The

response includes somewhat vague or inaccurate

evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The description and evaluation of the group therapy

techniques that were demonstrated in the video are vague and

inaccurate, or missing….. The

response

includes vague and inaccurate evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques, or is missing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25 pts

·    Identify what the therapist did well. · Explain something that you would have handled differently.

·    Identify an insight that you gained form watching the

therapist handle the group therapy.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–

100%

The response accurately and thoroughly

explains in detail what the therapist did well….. The

response accurately and thoroughly explains something that

could have been handled

differently…. The

response accurately and thoroughly

explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately

explains in detail what the therapist did well….. The

response accurately explains something that

could have been handled

differently…. The

response accurately explains an

insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well….. The

response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains something that could have been handled

differently…. The

response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response vaguely or

inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well, or is

missing….. The

response vaguely or

inaccurately explains something that could have been handled differently, or is missing.. The

response vaguely or

inaccurately explains an

insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy, or is missing.

25 pts

 

Criteria Ratings Pts
Imagine that you are leading your own group session. · Describe how would you go about

handling a difficult group member. · Explain how you would elicit

participation in your group. · Describe what you would anticipate to find in different phases of the group therapy. · Explain the benefits and challenges of group therapy.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–

100%

The response

includes a detailed and accurate description of how to handle a difficult group member….

The response accurately and thoroughly

explains how to elicit participation

in group therapy….

The response thoroughly and accurately describes

anticipated

findings in different phases of group therapy The

response includes a thorough and accurate

explanation the benefits and challenges of group therapy.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response includes a description of

how to handle a difficult group member…… The

response

explains how to elicit participation in    group therapy….. The

response describes anticipated findings in

different phases of group therapy……………….. The

response explains the benefits and challenges of

group therapy.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response includes a

somewhat vague or inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member….

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains how to

elicit participation

in group therapy….

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately describes

anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy….

The response includes a

somewhat vague or inaccurate

explaination of the benefits and

challenges of group therapy.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response includes a vague or

inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member, or is missing….. The

response vaguely or

inaccurately explains how to elicit

participation in group therapy, or is missing….

The response vaguely or

inaccurately describes anticipated findings in

different phases of group therapy, or is

missing….. The

response includes a vague or

inaccurate

explaination the benefits and challenges of group therapy, or is missing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25 pts

•  Support your reasoning with at least three peer-

reviewed, evidence- based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is

considered

scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–

100%

Three peer- reviewed,

evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment.

Resources

selected provide strong justification for reasoning and represent the

latest in standards

8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Three peer- reviewed,

evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment.

Resources selected to provide appropriate

justification for reasoning and represent the latest in

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Two peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the

assignment. Resources selected to provide appropriate justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. Or, three scholarly resources are used to support the

6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–

69%

Resources selected are not peer-

reviewed and evidence- based, or provide poor justification

for reasoning; or resources are missing.

10 pts

 

Criteria Ratings Pts
of care. PDFs are attached. standards of care. PDFs are attached. assignment, but provide only weak support for reasoning or do not represent the latest in standards of care.

PDFs may not be attached.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph

Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate

continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused— neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which

delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–

100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity….. A clear

and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that

delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,

continuity, and

clarity 80% of the time….. Purpose,

introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%– 79% of the time….

Purpose,

introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences

follow writing standards for

flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the

time….. No

purpose statement,

introduction, or conclusion were provided.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar,

mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–

100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and

punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–

89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar,

spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3 or 4 grammar,

spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

 

 

 

 

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, 5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–

100%

Uses correct APA format with no

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

 

Criteria Ratings Pts
spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers,

parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

errors.
 

 

 

Total Points: 100

 

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Proscholarly
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Medicine
This was done very well. Thank you!
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Well researched paper. Excellent work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Very fond of the paper written. The topic chosen is defiantly trending at this time
Customer 452495, July 27th, 2023
Medicine
Good work. Will be placing another order tomorrow
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
Medicine
Great work, Thank you, will come back with more work
Customer 452441, November 11th, 2022
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE ADVOCATE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM
The absolute best ! Thanks for great communication, quality papers, and amazing time delivery!
Customer 452467, November 14th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat