Assignment: evidence-based interventions on the treatment of hypertension
Assignment: evidence-based interventions on the treatment of hypertension
Task:
Theories are derived from conceptual models and are comprised of concepts and propositions. The only concepts that are common to all nursing theories, in some shape or form, are patient, nurse, health, and environment. These are sometimes referred to as the basic metaparadigms of the nursing domain. Identify two additional concepts that are relevant to your personal practice of nursing and explain how they relate to your practice and why they are important to your practice.
Do 1 page and provide references.
Registered Nurse Hospital Practice.
Four evidence-based interventions on the treatment of hypertension in adults were reviewed. The first article titled “Home Blood Pressure Tele monitoring: Rationale for Use, Required Elements, and Barriers to Implementation in Canada” by Wood, Boulanger, & Padwal (2017) asserts that the use of home blood pressure monitoring for hypertension diagnosis and management is highly recommended. To help patients adhere to the recommended home protocol, they recommended the use of tele-monitoring because its use, combined with protocol zed case management leads to statistically significant and clinically important blood pressure reductions (Wood, Boulanger& Padwal, 2017).
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%)
Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%)
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
F (0–75%)
Health History
(50 points)
Thoroughly presents a health history narrative that includes a detailed description of ALL the following components:
· Demographic Data
· Perception of Health
· Past Medical History,
· Family Medical History
· Review of Systems
· Developmental Considerations
· Cultural Considerations
· Psychosocial Considerations
· Collaborative Resources.
Information is presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.
46-50 points
ONE of the key elements of the health history narrative is not presented or lacks sufficient detail:
· Demographic Data
· Perception of Health
· Past Medical History,
· Family Medical History
· Review of Systems
· Developmental Considerations
· Cultural Considerations
Psychosocial Considerations
· Collaborative Resources.
Information is presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.
42-45 points
TWO of the key elements of the health history narrative is not presented or lacks sufficient detail:
· Demographic Data
· Perception of Health
· Past Medical History,
· Family Medical History
· Review of Systems
· Developmental Considerations
· Cultural Considerations
· Psychosocial Considerations
· Collaborative Resources.
Information is NOT presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.
38-41 points
THREE or more of the key elements of the health history narrative is not presented or lacks sufficient detail:
· Demographic Data
· Perception of Health
· Past Medical History,
· Family Medical History
· Review of Systems
· Developmental Considerations
· Cultural Considerations
· Psychosocial Considerations
· Collaborative Resources.
Information is NOT presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.
0-37 points
Reflection
(40 points)
Thoughtfully appraises the interviewee holistically. Reflection includes a detailed response to ALL the following questions:
· How did your interaction compare to what you’ve learned?
· What went well?
· What barriers to communication did you experience?
· How did you overcome them?
· Were there unanticipated challenges to the interview?
· Was there information you wished you’d obtained?
· How will you alter the approach next time?
Key/relevant information is presented in sufficient detail and is clear and organized.
37-40 points
· Thoughtfully appraises the interviewee holistically. ONE of the following questions is not presented or lacks sufficient detail:
· How did your interaction compare to what you’ve learned?
· What went well?
· What barriers to communication did you experience?
· How did you overcome them?
· Were there unanticipated challenges to the interview?
· Was there information you wished you’d obtained?
· How will you alter the approach next time?
Key/relevant information is presented in sufficient detail and is clear and organized.
34-36 points
· Broadly appraises the interviewee. TWO of the following questions are not presented or lack sufficient detail:
· How did your interaction compare to what you’ve learned?
· What went well?
· What barriers to communication did you experience?
· How did you overcome them?
· Were there unanticipated challenges to the interview?
· Was there information you wished you’d obtained?
· How will you alter the approach next time?
Key/relevant information is presented in insufficient detail but is clear and organized.
31-33 points
· Broadly appraises the interviewee. THREE or more of the following questions are not presented or lack sufficient detail:
· How did your interaction compare to what you’ve learned?
· What went well?
· What barriers to communication did you experience?
· How did you overcome them?
· Were there unanticipated challenges to the interview?
· Was there information you wished you’d obtained?
· How will you alter the approach next time?
Key/relevant information is presented in insufficient detail and is not clear or organized.
0-30 points
Grammar, spelling, clarity of thought
(10 points)
Presents information using clear and logical language. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are free of errors.
10 points
Presents information using clear and logical language. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation have two or less types of errors.
9 points
Presents information using clear and logical language. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation have three types of errors.
8 points
Information is unclear and difficult to follow. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation have three or more types of errors.
0–7 points
Total Points Possible = 100 points
